There's a vid consisting in clips of his smaller roles on his imdb page (I believe it's called a demo reel). It's just… Not overwhelming.
Also: there are instances in which Danny is just innocent, there are others in which he's an idiot. You're supposed to think that because it's true.

It seems the actress is otherwise engaged :(

Now that's all quite interesting, when did you read that? From reading her book (yeah I read her book) I wasn't aware Shonda was especially interested in Foley as a lead anywhere but I love learning about this kind of bts stuff.

"Murder" lost me too, I watched the whole season but I'm not sure I'll tune in for the next. I still care a lot about Scandal though.

Ah, I was wondering where I'd be brought up. People who are confusing the two points include Lewis Tan himself and about the 90% of those who are saying that Lewis Tan would have absolutely single handedly saved this show by playing this exact character.

I'll agree the graphic is weird.

Thanks for that, I had no idea. I miss James now. :(

Good point!

Again, we're talking about the show we have and that some people LT included believes (erroneously, in my opinion) would have been better with him leading. Of course a different show could be better off with a different actor, each show has its own ideal lead. If we want a show with an AA lead who's tall, sexy and…

How does the way Danny is the way he is change the fact that Finn Jones is the right pick for it?

People are saying a lot of things and some of them, Tan included (because that's what the interview was about), even here, are saying that he should have been cast as Danny Rand. Now, we have one Netflix/Marvel Danny Rand that I know of, and Tan is too tall, menacing, charismatic and even sexy to play him.

Apparently they only met at that Comic Con where they announced Weaver as the Defenders villain. I was pretty shocked too. But they do seem like they're going to make a great pair and Jones recently mentioned that some scenes with Colter are his favourite ever done.

Oh God I so agree (LC included).

In fact, people were actually complaining he had too many flashbacks and should be over it already.

I thought the debate on whether to kill or not was a call back to DD's second season and possibly an introduction to The Defenders, but I might be wrong.

I'm pretty sure he's seen enough paperwork and writing from episode 1 to this. It's nowhere as strange as already having a driving licence.

He, that's pretty much what he says. Making Danny adopted would have been almost no rewriting at all, but making Danny be a tall, muscular, charismatic guy who looks like Lewis Tan would have required an entirely different script.
But he auditioned for this Danny, not a potential other Danny, and yet he's straight up…

That's what I think too. His own attitude rubs me the entirely wrong way, especially since his acting doesn't seem stellar from what I've seen online. But that role suits him fine and I wouldn't mind seeing him again, at least if he stops shading everyone and everything.

No, I get the vision.

I don't know, it's organic enough to me. They're two lost kids in their early twenties with things in common. It's not enough for the greatest love story in the world, but we all know that's not where we're going, so it's enough for them to have a probably short-lived or at least not too relevant love story here and…