disqus2hcont0yfr--disqus
ChrRome
disqus2hcont0yfr--disqus

Their CGI company IS worse to be fair. The X-Men films have a similar problem of comparably weak CGI compared to Star Wars and Marvel films.

Unfortunately this movie ended up being way too overhyped and didn't live up to it for me. The movie is probably about as good as an average Marvel film. It also happened to be one of the most predictable films I've ever seen which was a pretty big bummer.

It is kind of unfortunate that when Americans call themselves Democrats or "left-wing" they actually mean they are basically central and are further right than even the furthest right parties of most comparable first World countries

How dare people want good living conditions for those less fortunate. That is truly morally and ethically wrong.

"liberals didn't really seem to remember all the pussy grabbing Bill Clinton has done".

You sort of proved his point for him. The fact that you had to qualify it as being "one of the most successful R-rated flicks" is already conceding that R-Rated films generally make less than other ratings

Barry's realization that the Flashpoint timeline was worse than the original made no sense.

I don't think the show did a great job at handling what was essentially the death of millions of people within the framework. A lot of the season seemed to be making a statement about the blurred lines before real life and artificial life then basically dropped it aside from Hope's death, which even then only seemed

Claiming Deadpool is great despite it being maybe the most cookie cutter film of them all strikes me as being odd. It actually manages to be filled with all 3 problems you listed

I was genuinely surprised at just how well the humor worked within this film. Deadpool is well loved mostly because of the humor, but that film is basically an endless stream of jokes with maybe only 10% or so landing while Guardians had jokes quite frequently but the jokes seemed to work much more consistently. The

I think the consistency of the MCU films is being understated by quite a bit in here. They are 15 films deep, about 50% more than the X-Men Universe, yet there are at least 3 X-films that are much worse than even the worst film in the MCU. DCEU is 3 films deep and has at least 2 films worse than the worst in the

Diamondback? He's probably the worst villain in the MCU

Why? Sequels aren't automatically worse than the first film, and this one was at least comparable in quality

The comments here really seem to counter the main complaint that continually exaggerating that there is no difference between the simulated people and real humans. Apparently a lot of people really missed that message

She didn't kill Radcliffe because she thought his body was meaningless, she killed him because him existing in the real world was being perceived as a risk to the framework.

That thought had crossed my mind earlier, but I don't think he would be willing to murder a real, conscious person to maintain cover

maybe it was nervous laughter to cope with what was happening or something. That carjacking scene was one of the most intense scenes I've ever seen in a film.

ironic that you can claim the film was vapid and self satisfied in a post that is composed almost exclusively of adjectives with no real substance or meaning.

was this supposed to be "midichlorians"?

I suspect most people aren't a fan of intentionally bad acting.