disqus2hcont0yfr--disqus
ChrRome
disqus2hcont0yfr--disqus

I understand it's cool to hate on Snyder, but to say his aesthetic is awful is just hating for the sake of hating at this point. The one constant across all of his films is that they are beautiful to look at.

I don't think that constitutes shoe-horning though. The ending still makes sense and the film alluded to something like an invasion happening. If the original script didn't have an apocalyptic event happening as well then I would concede that it was shoe-horned, but the endings are still fairly similar to each other.

he didn't make these films though…

The monster was named after the film title, not vice-versa so that doesn't really make sense.

how was 10 Cloverfield Lane's monster shoehorned? The whole movie was based on the premise of something attacking.

The town Alexandria, where they currently live, accepted them in and they are they have been living there with the prior inhabitants for the past 2 seasons . They then started trading with another town that accepted them. The conflict with Neegan actually began because they were helping that other group of people

Until maybe 10 years ago very few shows actually had a large narrative and pathway to resolution. Also, as the show has gone on, the characters are actually becoming part of a larger world again with the promise of trading with other towns to become sufficient and the soon to be alliance against Negan. The characters

those deaths aren't nearly as cruel and heartless. They also actually serve a point in the storyline since those deaths began the hero's journeys that several of the characters have since gone through.

As someone who doesn't watch the show, you seem to be making a lot of incorrect assumptions. About 2 seasons ago they began living in a town where everyone in it were nice people who didn't want to kill them, then last season they found another similar town.

This doesn't really make sense. You claim the show, an adaptation of the comics, stopped being creative a long time ago, yet the comics, which the show follows, remained creative past where the show currently is. From the perspective of people who haven't read the comics, wouldn't that mean the show still at least

There is no way that twist was planned from the beginning. I'm actually afraid to even rewatch the series because knowing the twist exists will make actions of a certain character make absolutely no sense

In its defense that's a lot earlier than it takes Buffy

I mean, you did make a completely irrelevant post so I don't know what you expected someone to say

I suppose we've basically come full circle with Man of Steel. Most of the hate for it also seems to stem from it not being similar to previous Superman portrayals. For both Into Darkness and Man of Steel, myself and lots of other people who didn't have attachments to previous incarnations of those properties have

It actually did incredibly well on review sites, actually fairing better than Star Trek Beyond which was also received very well. It was a lot more action oriented than previous Star Trek films so I suspect the real reason original fans didn't like it is that it's barely a Star Trek film at all.

Speaking of Into Darkness, that's another film I don't understand the backlash against. I guess it's because it has similar beats to Wrath of Khan but it is generally also loved by most people as well as critically. I guess all I'm really realizing is that people are often much more vocal when they hate something

I just started watching this and am a little baffled by the review. Yes there were a ton of reveals that could have been saved but that doesn't really make sense as criticism unless you already know that the show doesn't end up being effective because of these early reveals. They basically just said future episodes

Star Trek is still loved. Transformers did seem to retroactively become hated after the awful sequels though. People turned against Man of Steel before Batman v Superman came out.

Age of Ultron was quicker than the other two to have people turn against it, but it was also received very well when it came out. The Dark Knight Rises in particular was considered a great film initially, being considered a worthy sequel to The Dark Knight but it seems like the vocal people on the internet deem the

You should probably avoid going full on crazy when trying to justify your opinion