I'm not surprised that they don't like that version of the character. There is a difference between someone not liking a film and someone talking as though a show is just plain terrible as though it's common knowledge. This comments section is filled with the latter.

Gives basically the entire season great reviews then says:
"But for The Walking Dead, the tricks are all that’s left."

I'm not sure how that can be remotely considered a pivotal scene. Most people didn't even realize that was Jimmy Olsen

I believe that's his point. The dead version is certainly better than the Supergirl version at the very least.

Speaking as someone who grew up thinking that Superman was indeed lame and embarrassing, I certainly understand DC's decision to shift him away from the Donner version. The Donner films have unfortunately aged very poorly so people who didn't grow up with them consider them more of a running joke than anything else,…

well sure but a child's reaction doesn't apply to most people with this complaint

again it comes down to preference of tone and not the actual film or portrayal itself. I personally find Supergirl to be unwatchable due to it's excessive cheesiness, poor acting (mostly Kara's sister), and idiotic characters

why does it matter how he was killed?

I haven't seen Suicide Squad but I did think BvS was a genuinely solid film that was crippled by poor editing and condensing. I have yet to see the Extended version which supposedly fixes some of those problems though

I don't even understand the problem with killing Zod at all. Superman murders an actual helpless Zod in Superman 2 so the argument of killing in this film is already flawed.

Like, I can understand disliking the film because it doesn't match their preconceived notions of what Superman should be, but they should be able to separate the actual film from the baggage they are bringing into it. Tone preference is completely subjective, and considering that appears to be the main complaint…

there are people in these comments who are literally claiming it's the worst film of all time. When it came out it was received well by average movie-goers and even critics but judging from the comments you would think it must have gotten about a 1/10 universally

You kind of just made my point for me. Fury Road is leagues better than the previous Mad Max films due to the giant leaps in making of action films.

Pa Kent isn't the one who's supposed to be inspiring and a symbol of hope though.

Serious question, when did the internet randomly decide to turn against Man of Steel? Was it around the same time people decided to suddenly turn against The Dark Knight Rises and Age of Ultron?

what a sheltered life you have lived. The revisionist history surrounding that film is ridiculous

She's the director…

but he didn't leave those kids on the bus to die… Pretty sure the action of saving them trumps someone telling you that you shouldn't

I mean, if most millennials don't think those films are good by today's standard, maybe they actually haven't held up as well as you think. When you saw those films, they were the peak of the genre so they seemed impressive compared to others at the time. People watching them for the first time now have to compare…

In the 2010's alone you have at least Fury Road, Kingsmen, Edge of Tomorrow, MI4, MI5, Skyfall, Inception, several MCU films, Days of Future Past, Star Wars Episode VII, and Kick-Ass that are at least better than The Rock.
What films do you consider to be great in the 80s-96 stretch? The only ones I can think of are…