No, the lack of a solid evidence base is what makes it experimental.

“if we dont know the effects of the drug why are we prescribing it to certain people and not others?”

Can you point to a systematic review carried out by any of those organisations? I'll help: no you can't, because they don't exist. You idiots.

They have not performed systematic reviews. Again, you don’t know what you’re talking about

“and do these systematic reviews exist outside your mind?”

Why do you think we have female only changing rooms, rape crisis facilities etc at all?

Can you not read? As I said, the issue is with allowing ANY males into female only spaces, however they identify.

I mean it’s just an easily verifiable fact that that is what she has argued. 

No, that is not a slippery slope argument, it is an argument for safeguarding. Women can of course be a threat, but males are far more likely to be a threat.

In multiple systematic reviews, most recently in the Cass report, which confirms what many people including Rowling have said for years: the evidence base for puberty blockers is piss poor.

No, that’s not it at all. The argument is that once you allow some males into what should be female-only spaces then there is no way to tell who is a threat. You'd know this if you actually bothered to read what she has to say about it.

Stupid, baseless conspiracy theories are all you idiots have now that it’s been proven Rowling (among others) was right: you argue for the sterilization of children, she argues against it. 

You are a men's rights activist 

It's interesting seeing all these people acting as though Rowling's views on trans healthcare haven't been completely vindicated, isn't it. Like visiting a little zoo full of people stuck in 2019.

Every single systematic review of the available evidence has come to the same conclusion as the Cass review. You don't know what you're talking about

“Yeah, you did, and you know you did.”

Is english not your first language or are you genuinely this stupid?

Jesus Christ. Ok. I’ll try to make this easy for you.

Yep. This is why they have to invent ever more awful sounding crimes (she wants to ERASE trans people, she denies the holocaust etc etc), because the things she actually says are so utterly normal. 

No I didn't, you moron. I'm saying trans people, as a group were not targetted for being trans. That does not mean there were no trans people killed by the Nazis. How can you not understand that?