The medal of honor reboot used different engines and studios for campaign and multiplayer.

To be fair you can get the HD collection on Xbox digital for dirt cheap. I picked it up for $5 a few weeks ago because Sony refuses to put it up digitally and my PS5/4 can’t play my PS3 disc.

2008 wants its joke back.

Yea but you only quote Bloomberg and Schrier. What and who are your other sources? Where did your own knowledge come from? How does that differ from Schreier?

I was going to say the same exact thing. 

Didn’t sands of time get two sequels?  I remember that game being huge...

Oh boy...100 employees!? Watch out Activision!  

Articles like these are exactly why Kotaku sucks. What happened to that BS mission statement from your editor in chief?

So if Carvana IS that bad, why do you only have 2 examples of issues? No other facts or statements from their company?   Seems a bit thin and very click baity.

Yea because tits. It's still trash drama crap and not really gaming news. Equivalent of a high school version of TMZ, but even worse than that.

Every one who earns a check has profited off of the harassment. Why pile on Kotick? Like he really has any idea or care about what happens to all the lower people in the company. Just because he makes a shit ton of money doesn’t make him the bad guy.

How is that homophobic? Sounds like they don’t want to see genitalia. I see no reference to gender or sexual preferences....

No way. This update does not fundamentally change the game. It balanced 2 weapons, and changed 1 spot on 1 map. What’s funny is you can still snipe mid from T if you drop down. Gives CT a few extra seconds to escape. Pretty fair now.

THanks Sony, you gave the babies what they wanted

Whats this got to do with video games? Just trying to cause controversy 

You couldn’t find another reason to write psychosexual mind palace for a 20th time? Jesus come up with some other way to describe the narrative. It was clever once, sort of.

Let's see. Trash human only makes money off her looks from pathetic men. Why is she a story?

I took away the same idea, and really that's what Kotaku has always been. 

Why not just cover games apolitical? Why does everything need a spin? They can cover certain topics without sounding biased and elitist. Let the facts drive stories first instead of opinions and assumptions.

Very well put. Extremes on both ends are generally unfavorable to the majority of people,  so if Kotaku really wants to be inclusive and reach a wider audience then they need to stop leaning so hard to the extreme left. At least stop deriding anyone that doesn't share that same view.