Yes, don’t you understand, anyone having an opinion you don’t like is automatically bullying, even if the target of their ire is a billionaire

Yeah, except they know full well Biden won’t do that, so I don’t think they’re really considering it as a realistic threat.

I occasionally think about why it seems like horrible evil powerful monsters always live to be a ripe old age. It might be a bit of selection bias: it takes a while to get to the point where you have the power to be a monster, and then it takes a while longer for your monstrous actions to add up to massive evil and…

They might be concerned that Weinstein would walk free if the California conviction is also overturned. If they aren’t, then it might be better for them to just drop it and say “We’re confident he’d be found guilty but he’s already in prison until he’s 88 and we don’t want to put the victims/witnesses through all this…

*strained expression* ...but why a sequel?

Okay, I legit burst into embarrassing, snorty laughter at that response. Well done.

“I got an A!”

A spider, a raygun, a seagull, a rat in a cage.

Hell, I was bored halfway through the trailer. More superspy fantasy bullshit.

The gentleman’s F!

Chancellor of the Exchequer of Fucking Up the Comments Section Functionality For Months At A Time

I thought Hughes was Vice Barsanti. Schimkowitz is, like, Deputy Assistant Barsanti at best.

Given Bam’s comment, it does not appear to be the case.

Jupiter Ascending was fucking amazing (in a “I can’t believe people were paid to make this movie” way) while high. So much so that we actually watched it again a few weeks later.

They should do a list of Top 10 Jump Scares. All of them will surprise you!

Just got back from Godzilla x Kong. If you’re in the mood for generic CGI blockbuster garbage, then have I got the movie for you!

I wish the entire industry would standardize on “running time” being from the first frame to the last, including any company logos/credits up front (as well as any pre-movie shorts, rare though they are) as well as the entire end credits and any post-credit scene(s).

Haha, so I watched the trailer before reading the article, and when it got to the point where the concessions worker is explaining the trap, I was like, “oh obviously Josh Hartnett is the serial killer.” And then I was like, wait that’s so obvious that maybe that’s not it? And then the trailer reveals that that’s part…

“Footage in a trailer must be present in the finished film”

I’m the last person who’d appeal to tradition here, and the suits who run the studios can quite generally go fuck themselves with rusty spoons, but I don’t think one needs to appeal to tradition to point out that any kind of remedy for ensuring that trailers never mislead the audience about the final movie would be…