Sigh.

Then do your part and stop posting dumb Hillary smear job articles and get out and vote for a Democrat because the next POTUS is going to either change our SCOTUS to left leaning or keep it right leaning?

Do the people who write these breathless thinkpieces realize that if Sanders does get the nomination, we’re going to be hearing him say “I’m a socialist” on a near-constant loop for five months in ads? Do people really think he’s going to survive this wringer that supposedly Hillary can’t?

Nobody has considered what a real Trump Sanders fight would look like, because the GOP has kept mum on Sanders hoping to face him in the general. Hillary has played nice as well, saving her criticism Trump.

She’s not going to win West Virginia or Oregon either, coming up to California, but she will keep the pledged delegate lead. She’s going to win in both California and New Jersey and that will give her the majority of delegates to win on the first ballot of the convention.

How is this either a “major upset” or at all “unexpected”? Clinton didn’t contest Indiana, didn’t spend a cent on ads or any time there while Bernie was pouring in millions, even in the past few days her surrogates clearly said they didn’t really expect to win it, polls or no.

But remember that Independents are not all liberal in these numbers. About half are Randians who will be really conservative.

Clinton’s favorability levels off in a general election, I think. Liberals think she’s too far right, conservatives think she’s too far left; but this is only because they feel they have other options. When she gets to speak her message to a general electorate (instead of just the left), she’ll be able to show how her…

You are claiming that if the positions are filled with the people who have the best qualifications for the job, the hiring result is optimal from the viewpoint of social equality. Here’s why this claim is false.

I think anyone who wouldn’t vote for her because she had a female VP wouldn’t be voting for Hillary anyway.

Yet, you don’t blame Sanders for his support of the crime bill because you have rationalized it in your mind. LMAO

Good thing we aren’t talking about jobs then. It doesn’t need to be a job for you to get experience doing it. For instance, I am getting plenty of experience on dumb internet commentators right now, even though this is not my job.

This map is not weighted by population, which makes it deeply deceptive (and I’m a Bernie supporter).

Sanders hasn’t even bothered to register as a democrat in his home state of Vermont. Because he is hedging his bets. He wants to eat his cake and have it too. He craps on the democratic party every chance he gets, and expects democrats to elect him to be head of their party.

A few percentage points? LMAO. Since when is 16 points “a few”. Because there is no statistical path for Bernie to win. The all white caucus states are pretty much behind us.

HRC is further ahead of Sanders now than Obama ‘s lead at this point in 2008, and in 2008 everyone was pressuring her to drop out . Sanders’ inability to attract substantial numbers of minority voters is a serious obstacle.

I’ve disavowed national polling in any context since this whole thing started. It’s useless. It doesn’t make a lot of sense, and doesn’t track anything worth watching.

Because national polling is deeply flawed and almost entirely useless? If you can point me to a tracking poll that shows Hillary supporters in the south switching allegiances, I’d love to see it, but I doubt that one exists.

I love how this chart doesn’t include anything pre-politician. Like when Bernie Sanders was a shiftless layabout until he was 40 and Hillary Clinton was a lawyer working on some pretty impressive stuff.

Hillary Rodham graduated with honors from Wellesley, where she gave the commencement address, and then attended Yale Law School all before she even met Bill. Sure, she’s benefitted from being his wife, but even if she’d never met him, Hillary Rodham would’ve been pretty damn successful.