It's been a while since I've read them, but I remember liking books 4, 5, and 6 better than 2 and 3.

Sphere was my biggest book-to-movie disappointment(still love the book, BTW).

What makes you so sure Bernie's success in caucuses would hold up for the higher primary turnout?

I haven't read that much of it, but I loved the entry for I.V. Holtzman(basically the Zefram Cochrane of the Duniverse).

Just a nitpick(something nerds rarely do), but it takes place in the year 10,191 A.G.(After Guild), which according to The Dune Encyclopedia is 26,391 A.D.

Something else that occurred to me: if Bernie lost because of low voter turnout, why did he do better in caucuses, which have lower voter turnout than primaries?

Forrest Trump, Jr.: "Life is like a bowl of Skittles; you never know which ones are gonna kill you."

I'd say it stops being an adaptation if you could just have it be an original story without being sued for plagiarism.

What country has an ideal democracy with no corruption?

I think people are overestimating the influence of the media. The media are in it for ratings, so they show us what we want to watch. So I think it's basically our fault for being so fascinated by Trump that we motivate them to keep giving him airtime.

Being a member of Congress isn't exactly the same as being First Lady for eight years and pretty much maintaining that level of being in the spotlight ever since. Even for just her 8 years in Congress Hillary was way more scrutinized than Bernie ever was. As for him being an admitted socialist, that wasn't nearly as…

Even assuming that Trump is unelectable, how did he win the nomination if he's even less electable than anyone else in the GOP primaries?

Hillary's been in the public eye for a quarter century. How well do you think Bernie's reputation would hold up being scrutinized as much as hers for that long?

Seems to me like if you think the two candidates who got the most votes in their parties' primaries are their least electable candidates, then you need to adjust your idea of what makes a candidate electable.

I didn't detect any widespread antipathy towards him when he was on The Office.

I liked that show. I think it might've run out of ideas quickly if it had gone on longer since most of it was based on parodying other sci-fi, but I thought the 8 episodes we got were pretty funny.

Has something caused people to turn against Rainn Wilson?

And they couldn't have made them related? "It's just a show, I should really just relax"

I wonder why in MST3K they had Mike go by his own last name instead of making his character's last name Robinson too.

You make it sound like people don't go for total cheese anymore.