Your comment doesn’t make any sense. Exactly how have you demonstrated that I was being inconsistent? Show me exactly where I was being inconsistent? Do you even know what “inconsistent” means?
Same difference, amirite?
“Every religion but Christianity right?”
You see nothing wrong with banning religious head dress? Let me guess - you’re a Trump supporter, right?
Oh brother. Give it a rest already.
Keep fighting the good fight!
You are disgusting.
That is one classy broad.
You not being able to deal with opposing opinions makes you a bigot.
Humans are polluting the water, the air, and the land. We are destroying forests and driving animals into extinction. Humans are literally the worst. I would take a sloth over a human any day. Humans are destructive, sloths are chill and laissez faire. Glad to clear that up for you! ;)
Sloths >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humans.
Also, it’s weird that you call me “a joke” and then argue against ad hominem attacks in a post to another person. Not nice, Beard. ;)
Her (single, solitary) opinion does not refute current understanding of climate control (she says she doesn’t know), and that is certainly not proof that it is not an issue.
Wait, so because you provided a link to one scientist who says she doesn’t know the effects of climate of change (and doesn’t doubt that there are, indeed, effects), amidst a sea of scientists who do believe in climate change’s effects, you somehow think that proves your point?
1. She admits that climate change is happening.
Wow you have no idea how the environment works, do you? Entire ecosystems do not work the way the human body does. Please leave the thinking in this arena to the people who have devoted their lives to actually studying it, rather than your anecdotal experiences.
I feel like referring to any Fox News panel as “pundits” gives them an undeserved level of respect, authority, and relevancy. Can we just refer to them “Fox News Jabber-Heads” or something?
It’s going to need A LOT more than oxygen to live....