dingydust
dingydust
dingydust

i absolutely understand how mean this is, no question.

i read it if it makes you feel any better.

the best thing that ever happened is a google gossip mis-hit re: christina aguilera?

me too. & i was raised to pick that stuff up real fast, long before this kind of stuff was popular, when it still cost the outspoken way more than they got in strange return. & in this article? it's not there.

you are right, it's past its expiry date. the cheese hath turned is what i'm saying.

amphetamine psychosis will last awhile, even if there is no immediate dope in ones system. i dont know what the halflife is of crystal, but i know from horrible sad experience that somebody who's done a lot of dope in his life can go a week clean, more, & still act perilously speedy. in all the worst ways too—cos, i

i am so sorry too. i think everybody who reads this empathizes.

to scoop the impossible poop .....to go where no cat dares to go.....

we are on wave less than zero.

ps. i shouldve noted above that i do not mean fetish porn. completely different subject. & i dont really mean early porn either—pre-video, ie: behind the green door, ect & ect, when even the mitchell brothers wanted to create something that was not simply fucking for fucking's sake. i mean the endless endless stuff we

were all the people in porn like sharon mitchell, or annie sprinkle, or nina hartley, etc & ect. this would make a whole lot more sense. all of whom, btw, are older than i am & respect second wave feminism a whole lot more than does jezebel. i gotta say i find not only this lack of respect for the second wave by the

that is actually a great point.

me too. not here. someone at slate wrote a column asking why people might believe kevin clash over his skeezy accusers. i wrote the answer. ha!

he almost ran over me w/ his black rolls royce one point one million years ago, when he was first famous & i was a kid.

oy vey. i've said this before & i'll say it again. the show he's on is bad. it's dreadful. it's ghastly. you dont have to be religious to know it, nor do you have to be sitting around in a dope pit while yr manic depressive, entirely too soon to be deceased crazyspouse flips out while this revolting show is on the

long before it became trendy i was raised as an atheist. if a person is pushed into life from this vantage point he or she is gonna see things very differently from someone raised more traditionally. thanks for this article. i am grateful to see that this position exists at all, at least outside of my own weary mind.

didnt notice, apologies. thats odd. things mustve changed between the mid-60s & say, 1970, when i start remembering stuff. i had no idea they still had newsreels in 65.

ibid. thanks. especially after isabella rosselini's fabulous work on the same topic. this is just cheap & trendy, more stuff we surely need more of.

i dont think it's a newsreel, i think it's just television. maybe unedited television. maybe someone's super 8 footage. dunno. cant remember 1965.

it's easy work, rehashing. & you know better than do i, you guys have deadlines & need as many clicks & click-throughs as possible, so the more compelling, screaming headlines & stories the better. thats all this is. if it were humane, then it would be laughable or ignorable.