dingdongdavid
dingdongdavid
dingdongdavid

The best critique of South Park and one that’s come the closest to explaining why it rubs me the wrong way is that they always take the side of “not caring”. The end result is always that caring about anything is dumb and “both sides” are bad if either of them actually care. 

Listen, if anyone can be trusted to deliver a script about media pandering, it’s South Park, the ancient franchise that’s been pandering nonstop to mediocre edgy white dudebros for a quarter century.

You understand these two movies…have nothing in common other than the fact that they both feature gay men, right?

Fetterman isn’t cut out for being a senator. He possesses empathy, a backbone and integrity. These traits only hold you back in Congress.

Okay if you don’t understand why David’s behavior was bad, especially ignoring the pleas not to do it from the person who would eventually take her own life due to said problems he was mocking, then I don’t know how to help you.

So fucking stupid it is then! 

It’s all made up. What they supposedly want, what they don’t want, etc. It’s all smoke and mirrors.

It’s fun how meeting in the middle actually just means conceding to the right wing. Sort of like how being an independent of the “centrist” variety is just a euphemism for enabling that right wing.

This brawl represents the state of America right now. A powder keg.

Right, because Black people turning the other cheek and allowing racist ass white people to abuse is has gotten us so far as a country right?

and we will not stand for it.”

If only she had bothered campaigning in swing states, or not boosted trump’s campaign cause she thought he’d be easy to beat, or not colluded with the dnc to sabotage bernie’s campaign, or given people something go vote for, or not been so conseevative, and so on and so forth.

It’s clearly this, yeah.

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), formerly Speaker of the House, has been more vocal than most.

If you add supports to the deck, you’ve literally changed the deck. It’s materially different.

Yes, exactly, that’s the point of calling this damage control. He probably voted the way he did not because he likes the VRA (he has a history of trying to gut it and actually gutting it) or thinks what Alabama did here is bad or shouldn’t be allowed. He did it because he senses that the legitimacy of the court is

It got us Ronald Reagan, but slightly more conservative.

It’s irrelevant. By your explanation, any vote where she could vote by proxy would a vote that’s already guaranteed to win or lose without her vote. What is the incorrect view about what is and is not possible in Washington you think is perpetuated because people may not know that she was allowed to cast her vote by

He would have been such a good father, right? He’s probably a lot like you. A nothing, worthless, little boy who can’t make anyone happy. You’re not good at anything. Your family hates you. Everyone is so repelled by you that you’ll never know the love of another human being. We all know it would be better if you

No, the reason the Right is “having so much success attacking liberal rights when it comes to bioethics” is a stacked judiciary and gerrymandering, with a helping of misinformation and fearmongering.