The thing that kind of angers me most is that he couldn’t even get the fucking title of the film correct.

In her book Women Who Work

On a more cultural level, there are many women who go into OBGYN specialties with the distinct goal of refusing to provide abortions and fighting against them whenever possible. How this squares with the hippocratic oath, patient-centered care, or not being a complete traitor to your fellow woman is beyond me. A law…

Obligatory.

Because Democrats don’t vote in local elections.

But. Her. Emails.

Jesus, how did abortion access slide backwards so quickly. I’m lucky enough to live in a country where abortion is free and easy to access. It isn’t at all a political talking point. I read about about women in America and the struggles they have to go through to get what should be their legal right, and am horrified.…

I cannot believe that abortion is still a contentious issue in 2019.

I hate men b̶u̶t̶ ̶I̶’̶m̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ and I wish I were a lesbian.

This absolutely warrants nastiness. The fact that the First Amendment does not guarantee *this particular dude* the absolute right to have *this particular speech* heard by *this particular woman* is so absolutely clear it can be dismissed on the pleadings. This judge’s actions are appalling.

The most terrifying thing about this stunt is that I didn’t learn about here; I first saw it on the front page of Fox News website.

(3) He treats women like an 85 year old with white male privilege. He should get off the bench. If you do’t understand the world, you shouldn’t be making decisions about other people’s lives.

I did once have a guy pull out my headphone to talk to me, chastising me for ‘ignoring him’; it was beyond shocking, and me realise that I’d somehow become used to guys interrupting me ‘normally’. Most recently, I was explaining to my partner why the wine was labelled vegan, and a guy leaned over to REPEAT EXACTLY…

This is so preposterous, I have no words. Are women allowed to hang up in the middle of a call? Not answer their e-mails? Refuse to engage in a conversation in public? Is saying ‘no comment’ in an interview verboten now?

This doesn’t warrant nastiness. The most likely options are that (1) the judge wants a full and airtight record so there won’t be room for appeal, or (2) the judge genuinely doesn’t understand Twitter because he’s 85.

Also, AOC has a separate account for her official positions.

The Presidential Records Act doesn’t apply to members of Congress.

My understanding is that Trump cannot block anyone from his Twitter account.

AOC blocking idiots on Twitter is OK. What’s not OK is Federal Judges using draconian laws to block people from voting. 

So if they rule against AOC that means TRump can’t block anyone else, amirite?