You seem pretty upset for a money sink being temporarily removed.

Charge the price of the game or scale the scope of the game to align with an appropriate price.

I don’t know if Kotaku purposefully avoided the story, which is why I asked the question. You do understand how questions work, right?

I want lying to anyone and I had not seen their response before you posted it. Now hope in my op I put “story” in quotes implying that it may not actually be a story.

Are you guys purposefully avoiding the “story” that EA removed the refund button from their site forcing people to call in a deal with long hold times?

Seems like a narrow point of view.

Whelp, I’m out. CoD and now Battlefront we’re almost certain purchases before this crate mess.

Your article title is needlessly long.

So... no boat?

All of this makes me glad that 1080 still looks really good. I’m hoping I can put off upgrading until the next round of hardware releases vs these refreshes.

That guy actually said, “like and subscribe for more videos” as he was walking out?

It so they can say they released a physical version to appeal to the collectors and, separately, those who feel that digital is a pathway to not being able to access your games once some unnamed server gets shut down.

Oh wow! My bad! I thought you were referring to the way the author used the term up there in the first paragraph. Given how smart you think you are, I never thought you would attack a random Twitter user for a lack of precision since that lack of precision is a given, and going after a Twitter user under such a…

Time Traveler

No, it’s not. A sign of intelligence is knowing when a writer is having fun with language and knowingly using it incorrectly for a purpose. Being rigidly pedantic is not.

Before you buy a used game you could always... I don’t know... look at it first.

Books degrade over time? What timeline are you working with. I’ve got a shelf of books from the 50s and 60s that are perfectly readable and are showing no signs of failing apart.

There would need to be a lot of collected data to figure out how to babe people together and the model for doing so would need to be both flexible and scalable, which I’m sure they will be accounting for.

Eric, I feel like you’re missing the time component. Over a period of time, the odd collision you experience as a “good” driver will have a minimal or temporary impact to your rating whereas for habitually poor drivers, the will constantly be pushing themselves from good drivers. The meet result is a point in which…

Interesting how after 23 comments, now 24, you’re the only one to bring this up... and in such a mature way too.