digbette
digbette
digbette

Someone doesn’t have to be consciously aware of the image they are creating and it’s signification when they make the choices necessary to create that image. Kim is used to curated her visible self. She could just as easily just find this “appealing” for a host of reasons that are open to analysis without being

This struck me:

If you want to change your screen name just go to the icon on the far right, click that. Go through to ‘your profile’. In the box on the left there’s an ‘edit profile’ button. Hit that and change display name.

I feel that people are being a bit reactive and surprised so many teachers can’t see what was being attempted here. Recreating visual source material from a certain period is a big part of stimulated learning for visual and kinetic learners. This wasn’t an entirely terrible idea, but displaying the final product as

Honestly, as an ex high school teacher myself I think this could’ve worked ok with older kids. Getting them to view the images and then draw the people, so make the connection that they are drawing people as they would draw their family, etc... it’s not a horrible idea. It just seems like keeping displaying those

Slave and master and the Elliot experiment are actually a little different. I only know this because I learnt the former in teaching college and the latter later, and they were not quite the same. I think both are probably taught but the Elliot experiment isn’t meant to be conducted in a class length situation, but

Now playing

This is a really common lesson in history classes and is actually taught, still, as a core lesson. It’s called “slaves and masters” and the context can change but it’s the same game. Generally speaking at some point the people are meant to switch sides to get both views, but often that’s left out, which makes it more

Well, it’s Wall St. Checks out!

Oh, you mean they married him for the money? Doesn’t appear so? It seems like he has married, for the most part, extremely dependant and damaged women and then “cared” for them, which doesn’t actually require money so much as a desire to take a particular role. He’s more just a daddy than sugar daddy by all reports.

He’s had his thumb in a lot of pretty lucrative pies. Early career success, movie producer, media empire mogul, etc. He’s a very weird but interesting guy.

This was the home of his THIRD wife. Three women, at least, married him. It’s utterly baffling.

I’m actually a bit annoyed here because this acid bath business was part of a WAPO expose that showed Bannon himself never lived at this property. He leased it, and used residence there for potential tax and voter fraud, but it was the home of his ex wife.

You think Naomi Campbell is getting a career advancement from being on Kara’s Jez posts about shade? I do not. I do think you should go fuck yourself.

We have too much time on our hands. You. are. trolling. a lady blog. On a Saturday night. That is your life.

That’s one variation on the theme. I considered it but decided to go with the drawn out hissing version as I find that more repellant.

Standing in the exact spot that little girl is standing in front of the bull on Wall St no I don’t not that’s so amazing I wonder how it’s there but invisible and we can only see her!

I see what you did there and I applaud you.

I meant it more as like... they will see fierce beast and assume it’s a another dude and not a Callisto reference (which is what I am assuming was implied here...)

A bear would be perf but you’d have to put boobs on it for the finance bros to get the gist.

Oh my god just fuck off.