He didn’t get jumped.  Also, hosting SNL isn’t the same thing as having a guest over to your house.

Tesla’s stock went down like 9% after that interview, and the Air Force launched an investigation into its relationship with SpaceX.

So, one thing is that the employee in the linked article who complained about Musk’s hypocrisy didn’t show up to work high or drunk. She was a medical marijuana patient who didn’t use marijuana during office hours. She tested positive for THC because THC lingers in your system for days and weeks, even though,…

“You guys are just going for clicks.”  “It’s all a stunt, anyway.”  “LOL, why do you even care??”  “Faux outrage.”  And the center square “SNL hasn’t even been good in decades.”  I got bingo. Anyone else?

Important to note, if you go to the linked article, the former employee who complained about Musky’s hypocrisy was NOT getting high at work. She was a medical marijuana patient who used it off hours as prescribed, but when she was drug tested, tested positive because that’s how THC works.

but no need to bring up his subsequent memo to his employees that they’ll totally be fired if they show up high to work

Musk is representing Tesla when he goes on a podcast that also happens to be one of the biggest platforms that has ever existed. For a CEO, that’s work, not just off-hours idle chit chat. 

Lecturing someone about how they feel about the potential complicated public fallout of that revelation is not the good look you think it is. 

This show was pretty funny because the writers did the work of writing sketches that had some room where it would be funny if a stiff awkward guy showed up being stiff and awkward, and the cast did the work of working with Musk’s stiff awkwardness. Elon Musk was not worth that effort, and the show overall was not…

What a weird comment. This article doesn’t discuss racial injustice or race at all (it doesn’t seem to be Jalopnik that’s obsessed with race, incidentally). I’m also not sure what you mean when you say the “courts explained their position on the retrieval of the device, so presumably they were also involved in the…

I mean, they’re going to arrest her anyway eventually if five officers are showing up to question her and they’re placing tracking devices on her car. And she’s already getting harassed by the police *a lot*. Also, as the article notes, it’s an open question whether doing anything with a device that police essentially…

What is the point of this comment?

Who, pray tell, do you think I’m “discriminating” against?

Lol, you people are so fucking predictable. Thanks for the response!

I bet he’s in a better position than the fucking PAs who quit.

So your counterargument to “Jamie Kennedy maybe shouldn’t have starred in dangerous anti-abortion propaganda without at least doing some research” is “Well, you give positive reviews to Apple products and CW shows.”  And, uh, here you are commenting, anonymously, on these blogs, which seems an even worse use of time…

“Abortion only in limited circumstances” is not “centrism,” that’s a conservative position. “Centrism” would be something like supporting the outcome in Roe v. Wade--few restrictions on abortion in the first two trimesters, before viability, and then limited availability of abortion after viability.

What if I don’t care about banning it, but also have no sympathy for streamers who choose to do it and then wind up treated like cam girls by their audience?

So you prefer that we do not acknowledge gender until the child is capable of deciding on their own?

I didn’t say you were putting words in my mouth.