I, for one, would rather our kids not be exposed to gunfire in class more so than anatomically correct 16th-century Italian sculptures.

Panels missed a couple blanks: the BLANK CHECKS our legislature accepts from the gun lobby; and the BLANK STARES they give when asked why they continue to pocket that blood money.

Meanwhile, Florida's cracking down on a much graver threat to the safety of schoolchildren: anatomically correct 16th-century Italian sculptures...

We had like, I dunno, 3 different actors play Spider-Man in the movies within a decade, so perhaps Robbie’s Harley is “DCU canon” and Gaga’s isn’t? Shit gives me a headache...

I’d press her on Gayle first to drive the “gay/bi outing“ angle.

Oh, but a group that managed to breach the US Capitol and conduct ACTUAL violence was NOT on their radar???

I'll be impressed if he cuts one into his beard.

Maybe when our Congresscritters get a breather from slaying the “TikTok dragon,” they can squeeze Ticketmaster's nuts in an antitrust vise...

They (meaning the entire goddamn country) already do this via a racket called "civil asset forfeiture."

The best part about the GOP running batshit legislation like this is when they discover too late that it will run afoul of the profit margins of their corporate donor overlords...

No. Because, unlike “anti-vaxx” legislators, those fictional monsters have value (entertainment at minimum).

You are by NO means alone. I also felt absolutely shitty that, when I thought it was actually Thiel who died, a spark of jubilant catharsis washed over me. But now I'm over it. The shame, that is.

With banter like this, it may as well be "The Lawnmower Man." 

“Nothing to see here; keep your focus on banning TikTok...”

Stealing the fuck out of this!

With a name like “Kyrsten,” it’ll probably be her “true calling.” 

Good point! If he REALLY had a “good name” to clear, you'd think he’d seek restitution for all the money he lost from this. Or maybe he’s banking on this blowing over in a couple years and having a “career renaissance.”

Lindsay’s.

This. If you’re going to publicly label someone as “problematic” then you have a responsibility to detail why they’re “problematic” to protect others from the same “issues” you may have had with that person. Otherwise don’t say anything at all.

Looooooong overdue. Was “tolerant” of this exploit until LinkedIn hit me up with an annual resub charge (about $300). I didn’t get a 30-day advance warning of the charge coming and, most damningly, didn’t get an email receipt from them the day they actually billed me. I had to go through my bank to track the source of…