Now they tell him!

While an incident where Majors allegedly abused Jabbari while they were riding in a car together was the impetus for the actor’s trial in the first place, those initial charges were brought by the state of New York rather than Jabbari herself.

aka Zoolander face

This is how he poses now after the conviction (this pic is clearly from the naacp awards that happened the other day). A week or two ago he was on the red carpet with his new girlfriend grinning ear to ear. His PR team must have told him to stop making that pouty face.

At least you found a different photo without him making that pouty face.

DotD at least had that bravura opening scene and credits.  Unfortunately that was the high point of the movie (which I still liked, but it sure came out swinging).

Everyone in the original knew exactly what kind of ridiculous film they were making and just went for it. And I’ll bet there’s no one in this version who can begin to match Sam Elliott’s contribution.

I absolutely agree with your analysis here.

Dawn of the Dead remake was good. So was Pirahna. If you don’t like schlocky horror you’re out of luck. 

Jake Gyllenhaal strikes me as a weird little theatre imp (in a positive way) who also happens to be willing to be superhero buff. I’d disagree with people who say he doesn’t have charisma, but it’s a more malovelent, mischievous charisma - his intensity in films like Zodiac or Nightcrawler is amazing, and then on the…

Really?!? You can be sympathetic to the guy who was used, abused, and molested as a child? That’s some sociopathic thinking.

“a humanity that had evolved past conflict and character flaws.”

I’ve been rewatching all the Star Trek shows in chronological order, i.e. starting with Enterprise and going on from there.  I’m up to TNG, and Season 1 was ROUGH!!!!  It was way worse than I remembered.  Season 2 was better, but it had some clunky moments.  It really improved in Season 3, which is when I’m assuming…

Huge respect to Roddenberry for kicking off Star Trek. But TNG didn’t get really good until they kicked Roddenberry to the curb, so I don’t see his “vision” as necessarily being all that great. And, by all accounts, he didn’t like Wrath of Khan, so his tastes are questionable.

No, because most court cases don’t have them. They’re used in very specific examples lol

A person writing letters on behalf of a diddler is a choice they made.

You shouldn’t be friends with a pedophile. Sorry that you need to be told this by a stranger on the internet. Comparing willing friendship and support to a constitutionally required defense attorney is willfully obtuse and proves you have no argument.

lol letters of support are not protected or included in any sort of laws or rules about our courts. they are emotional appeals, that’s all. A lawyer is just doing their job. A person writing letters on behalf of a diddler is a choice they made. 

Personally, if I had a friend who was known to have, or accused to have diddled kids, I would not remain friends with that person, nor would I write a letter defending them. But I’m weird like that.  

“even those who have done horrific crimes.”
um, no, that’s a very meaningful difference..