derrickduke12
har1987
derrickduke12

Kindness, selflessness, justice, truth, hope, sympathy. 

Not just that. He also killed the last of his kind.

And you got all of that in this film. Yet here you are, shallowly reducing it nothing more than a dude bro movie, when you got clear storylines and themes that are mixed well with dialogue and visual Storytelling. You got an adult examination of the subject matter. 

You don't get it decide who is a superman fan. 

Again that couldn’t be wrong. He stated that while he deconstructed the character. He still made him Comic accurate not just visually but in terms of Character. It’s still Superman.. It’s not a different character. It’s the same character.. It’s just a different iteration. The same values and core characteristics are

No, This is Patrick. No hurt feelings whatsoever. Just incredulity at the ridiculousness posted here. 

Couldn’t be more wrong. The world engine brought down the buildings. The ship that zod was piloting onky crashed I to the sides of the buildings but it didn’t bring them down. Zods fight with superman only thought down one building and that was done by zod. They only crashed dinto the sides of buildings and that was

That's a ridiculous claim. The guy who adapted the novel into the 1949 film wasn't objectivist. Being a fan of the book doesn't make you an objectivist. Try again. 

You remember that it's a great film? 

A) it doesn’t. He sends clark to keep his mother and the rest of the people safe who were more important. Him using his powers would have exposed him. Using his super speed to miraculously survive a tornado would have aroused a hell of alot of suspicion andedia attention fueled by the fact that people were aware of

Not a sock puppet. I just agree with alot of what he says. 

It doesn't. It gives different answers but still let's the audience decide what the answer is from their perspective. That's not poor structure. 

How much clearer do I need to be? I’ve got no Anger or hate. Just incredulity at the ridouclous claims. 

It’s a great one.

You can keep going all you want. You'll still be wrong and what you wrote will be the biggest bullshit ever. By all means go right ahead, stranger. 

No Harvey’s death was intentional. He had to chose between Harvey’s life and the kids life. He chose the kids life. He wouldn’t have oushe sthwm over if didn’t know what the consequences of his actions. He still killed Harvey dent.

No. They’re two different things. It wasn’t the saving the kids part.. It was doing it while he exposed himself. Had he not Revealed himself to the kids, Jonathan wouldn’t have had a problem.

No it asked to care for the people who were dying by the world engine and for peolle who were going to die if zod were to live, not just the family. 

He didn’t punch the pilot. Check again. He crushed his head with his hand.

You’re watcbing his origin. He starts to become that Character at the end.