I think the PC Bullies legitimize mafioso style enforcement of their group think ideology. They are also willing to legitimize bad people who are willing to enforce their ideology. I think it fits.

That is much larger than I would assume, though I don't think it an unfair or inaccurate figure, just higher than I would have thought. I am far from an expert on this, thanks for that information!

Well, typically boiling things down to "both sides are equally bad" is usually a false equivalency. If you're saying the advocates or the talking heads on different sides of this are often similarly obnoxious and tone deaf, alright, that makes sense.

I think many people are naturally inclined to make extreme assumptions based on events. I would like to believe that just as many people, if not more, blindly assumed there was a massive problem with "Rape Culture" on the campus as assumed there was a problem with men being falsely accused. I think both sides of this…

Im just speculating at this point. I would imagine it's that people are crammed together in close quarters with little else to do but mess around. I could also speculate on a "macho" culture contributing to men and women being more sexually aggressive and generally intoxicated.

I have to agree, it's a small number. Almost insignificant. I think it's absurd but I also think a climate in which those few who do falsely report rapes are defended blindly with such great fervor contributes to that paranoia. UVA comes to mind.

Rape is vastly under reported when you consider all forms of sexual assault rape.

I would imagine that in his position he encounters it more frequently than statistics would indicate it happens. So while it is terribly uncommon he happens to be in a position to deal with those types of situations.

Because they are emotionally unstable and concerned that they will be labeled sexually promiscuous? Also they are probably attention seekers and manipulative people.

It definitely is a thing, it's not nearly as widespread as MRAs have you believe but it's far from not a thing.

Because some people regret their decision in the morning?

My eyes have rolled out of my head.

Actually when an idea is systematically shouted down by either private or public individuals then it is actually an example of Oppression. Whether you want to quibble over whether it meets whatever arbitrary metric you deem to be "True Oppression" is up to you.

I apologize for being a dick to you, I definitely was. I also tend to come into these discussions angry and in for all intents and purposes "Troll mode", I also have to dial it back quite often. It's easy for me to assign people I communicate with the same traits as the worst of those who have expressed similar…

Ah I see, I guess I was taking whimsy at a very literal definition. I can see that the show has become alot less whimsical in the sense that is less completely outrageous and absurdist.

I understand that. That much is clear. The method you used the reference seems to indicate it's somehow relevant or a rebuttal to his statement. Are you implying you simply just made the reference for no reason other than to make it?

Are you seriously comparing online shopping to online social interactions?

Im not sure that they never said that there was not a good reason to be against fat shaming, but rather that if someone who is fat were to post their pictures online expecting praise, they should not be surprised when they are fat shamed. I don't think it made any excuses for the bad behavior, rather criticized the…

Because they are totally the same argument. Because not watching a show is as easy as emigrating. Sure. Okay.

This might help,