Also, saying “I bet Roy Moore would love to fuck her,” is no less creepy. And yet that was the top comment on the Deadspin post about this girl two days ago.

Hot take alert:

Burfict’s head shot on Brown two years ago was way worse.

The joke is about sexualizing and victimizing a young girl, with a thin veneer of political commentary. And over 500 people starred it. Pretty fucking disgusting, even for deadspin.

“Roy Moore messed his pants” watching this video. Please, explain the joke in some other way.

I don’t think anyone is offended that Roy Moore is the butt of the joke. Fuck Roy Moore.

Way to project, creep.

Threads like this remind me that the Deadspin commentariat is as trashy and disgusting as the rest of the internet. What a fucking disgrace.

You seriously look at these emails and don’t see sexual harassment? I really hope you are trolling.

And you posted the email here, which is why it was sent to you in the first place. How very subversive.

 If it makes you feel better, the relationship between ball 65 and ball 66 is an illusion. You were no closer to winning than the person who needed O67 or B17.

The public does not seem to be allowing people to redeem themselves through apology. For better or for worse, every apology so far has been answered with, “Great. You’re still a creep. Go away.” I don’t see any reason why Takei would be treated any differently.

Wow, you just lifted that comment straight off reddit.

Yeah, what an idiot not reading things!

“Report: Man’s views change in light of new evidence. ”

“Whenever any person is charged with knowingly committing an assault or battery upon a law enforcement officer. . . the offense shall be reclassified . . . from a misdemeanor of the first degree to a felony of the third degree.” Fla. Stat. 748.07(2)(b).

The officer, meanwhile, received a commendation for bravery.

Nobody is defending the girl’s actions. She was wrong. That doesn’t mean the officer/security guard acted appropriately.

Look, the question is not “does he have a right not to be hit?” because of course he does. The question is, “What is the appropriate response to a violation of that right under the circumstances?”

You have bad opinions.