Huh? The issue isn't the game, it's the random basketball tie in that doesn't mean anything. "Oh shit hockey fans, you know how soft NBA stars are? THEY FLY PRIVATE JETS BETWEEN FINALS CITIES!!!!!!! SOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFFT"

I really do want to find out what the fuck that's for.

It took me 10 minutes to swing back around, see your comment, and type in a response. Unlike some people, I don't sit here waiting for people to try to vent my hockey sadness on.

I mean, sort of, but with your mom, not mine.

It's better in separate doses

Also, how's it feel that your mother got reamed by a piece of shit fucking clown?

It was two different but related posts, you sad, sad hockey wank.

I only watch soccer in the WC, and I only caught the second half, but it looked like Australia was getting boned by the refs. Not that there were a lot of huge calls, bad penalties or anything, but just the constant stream of non-calls for the Aussies and called flops for Chile.

More like her fill

No thanks, I got my fill from yours.

You are literally the worst.

I'm not even a hockey fan, but fuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu.

I don't know anything about hockey, so I might be missing something, but I really can't parse that statement. Isn't it equally true of football/basketball/soccer?

Does no one have a problem with their hideous mouths? Their insectoid eyes?

But, y'know, Texas is freedomland

How fun would it be to find a guy who actually performed with this kind of effect, though? Like, out of the league, there's one guy whose chances of making a shot improve dramatically if he makes the first, how exciting would that first shot be?

It's not the Spurs (which... I'm a fan, but I think that thing's way overblown at this point), it's just basketball. Every other 'Sports' website on the internet includes stuff about the finals, because, y'know, Basketball's more popular than Hockey, and it's the championship. Not only that, but this series has wild…

He's wrong, though. Why didn't shooting percentages go sky-high after they stopped hand-checking? Did everyone in the league suddenly become worse? Why did teams score so much in the 80's?

I think he'd definitely be better. He was a more efficient player by a large enough margin that I think most of the difference would be sustained; I'm of the opinion defenses today are a lot better, by virtue of being better coached and more athletic.

The Knobcats look bad in comparison to the best teams. But, and this is the important bit: the more people who want to play basketball, the better the resulting 500 NBA players are, and a hell of a lot more people are trying to make the league these days. Not only that, but players now are better shooters (because…