First of all, let’s change the narrative from “gun grabbing” to “sensible gun control legislation”. Fingerprint locks on guns? Sensible! Limits on the number or types of bullets you buy? Sensible! Ensuring that guns are being sold in a legal and safe manner, no matter the venue (ie private sales or gun shows)?…

I understand what the intent is here, but I think there isn’t enough evidence to support it.

So basically we shouldn’t give abusers the benefit of the doubt because the pressures the legal system and society place on the victims often prevent them from testifying... Unless Deadspin thinks they can score an incredibly cheap racial point. Then fuck her, show me the tapes.

Dude go read your comment history...You’re some sort of reverse troll where you say semi-controversial things then justify them by being an asshole or playing the latino/gay card...Are you okay?

The point is not “people being too mentally and emotionally immature to hear it”. The point is that it’s incredibly inappropriate in any workplace setting to use that word or that example to illustrate any point you’re trying to make, let alone when the occasion is *a PR crisis call about how you can repair your image…

“Sanders isn’t the absolute, 100%, perfect candidate ever ...

Nah, they need to go play COD.

I don't understand why people are blaming tesla. Autopilot didn't kill him, his inability to look where he was going did.

I actually learned something quite useful from this letter, and I think some of you would agree: