She won’t? Are you sure bout that? Because while you’re busy swallowing every rumor and lie about something Trump has supposedly said, you’re not even bothering to look up all the f’ed up stuff Hillary has actually said and done. She has no problem destroying the lives of other people to ensure her own rise to power.…

The price is very reasonable. I shop these all the time, and you can expect to pay just a few hundred less for something in very rough shape compared to this. And for something in slightly better condition, the price can easily double.

Because PolitiFact never gets it wrong, do they. And they’re not staffed by a bunch of partisans, no sir...

Yeah, but they weren’t fans of Reagan, either. There’s a missing element to the analysis - the Mullah’s honestly believed the “cowboy Reagan” would go to war with them. His rhetoric leading up to the election was every bit as bombastic and nationalistic as Trump is now. (Reagan was just more eloquent and jovial about…

I’ll summarize this article.

That’s just not funny.

Keep it coming, buttercup.

Not sure what you have to gloat about. I made you my bitch, and a whopping three people are still watching it happen. (Hint: nobody cares. Get over yourself. Across is for attention, go lengthwise for results.)

Except... I didn’t. I savagely refuted all of your moronic assertions and painted you as the fool that you are. You can’t handle it, which is why you continue to come back here time after time trying to have the last word.

Ironic that after employing so many logical fallacies, you then quit ‘the game’ because of a logical fallacy you didn’t like.

The traditions are not arbitrary - they’re clearly spelled out and codified into law, based on Naval Tradition.

My own stupid argument was that “Warships should be named after persons or events of historical significance to the Navy,” and later that ‘there is a tradition in naming ships’, both of which you rejected.

Idiot....

I feel like I want to ask for details to this story, but then I also feel like I don’t care. Unless it’s going to be funny. In which case, I encourage you to take a risk.

This just make me giggle like a school girl...

Actually, the argument I’m making is called “appeal to tradition”. The argument I’m countering is called “ad hominem”, which is usually taken as a negative.

The Chickadee was decommissioned more than a half century ago... and that’s also a stupid name. Not sure what the relevance is here.

So basically we’re naming a Navy asset after a guy whose only claim to fame is that he’s gay, and he happened to have served one term of enlistment. I’m calling bullshit on this one - this is pure soviet style politics. There’s no reason to name a warship for Milk. A community center in the Castro? That would be a…

I’m not sure what “the standards” are, but I’m willing to bet about 60% were nixed because they were just plain moronic, but 40% were nixed because they didn’t tow the line of the left-wing orthodoxy that anything gay should be treated like it’s the greatest thing ever to happen to mankind, even if it’s really not.

Two reasons. First, they’re going to use the biggest damned thing they can partly because it impresses the hell out of people. Air Force One isn’t just a sweet ride, it’s also a projection of American power and prestige. Landing that plane at a US airport guarantees a few extra votes no matter where it goes. And…