You cry and complain that there were leaks against Hillary Clinton, and now you’re advocating doing the same for Donald Trump.

That is a false representation of a strawman fallacy. You have also avoided the question.

If you want to start throwing out insults and logical fallacies, you’ve fallen into ad hominem.

Such sweeping generalizations.

Legally, it really shouldn’t matter if the order was truly a defensive measure or not. Previous courts have ruled that the President (Under article II of the constitution) has authority to conduct foreign affairs and address immigration.

Just curious. Do you read Breitbart, Fox News, or listen to Rush Limbaugh?

I’m mostly wondering where this kind of scrutiny was when President Obama put an immigration hold on Iraqis and other Muslim majority countries.

You’d be surprised.

Stupid according to the checklist of whom?

Just keep on extrapolating.

Classic Kinja leap of logic.

On the contrary, I don’t see conservatives rioting in the streets and trashing college campuses (like what happened at UC Berkeley).

You’ve resorted to name-calling rather than addressing the facts. That weakens any attempt at civil, rational discussion.

You seem like a learned individual. I hope you realize your mindset is one-sided. You are calling for a “social” cleansing by permitting illegal assaults and the silencing of some groups who express differing views (even if they’re radical) than yourself. “Dude, everyone who isn’t <insert ideology here> needs to get…

Stop playing CNN nightly news. They said nothing about being pro-Nazi. The leaps of logic by the majority of Kinja posters never ceases to amaze me.

Once again with the extreme, irrational viewpoints.

There are two sides of the fraud coin. I lost a lot of money from G2A because supposedly “people” claimed the keys I gave them didn’t work.

It is not justified behavior. The fact of the matter is this man committed a crime (assault), simply because he disagreed with Richard Spencer.

You realize the hypocrisy of you posting that image in response to an opinion you don’t agree with, right?

The man is exercising his right to free speech. Imagine if a neo-nazi decided to sucker punch a Black Lives Matter speaker in the face while they were on camera. Or what if someone from the Women’s march was sucker punched on camera while expressing their opinion?