We have submarines for that.

Was this a Top Gun reference?

So how about you now stop replying trollface?

Yes, it's socially shaming stores to stay closed on Thanksgiving Day. The same TV can be bought on Friday, and until 3 days ago, it was.

Because all the people you mentioned here are either 1) essential or 2) compensated highly enough so that they know the deal they are getting into. Workers at KMart fall into neither of those categories. I don't know what is to be done, other than my personal choice of refusing to step inside a store on Thanksgiving.

You're boring me now. Later.

His conviction for the access to records stands, as it should.

Well, every response I've ever gotten from you is pretty much name calling. Just like that one. Every one. Is there some sort of issues you have with children and little boys? Cause you do mention that one, a lot. To a disturbing extent. And you engaged today, again. And I'm the troll? I don't give a single shit about…

I really fucking hate bogartcat. He's such a fucking idiot. I want to shoot him five times in the face and once in the knee! I really want to! Seriously, I would do it! I hope he dies, and slowly, and I'm going to sit there and laugh while he does. It will be awesome. I'm going to google "bogartcat", and that will be…

Ooh, it hurts, doesn't it? Ok, I'm going with daddy. DUI defense? Possession and divorce? Consumer bankruptcy? Somewhere in like, ummm Virginia? But too far to get on a train to DC.

I will say it again - a judge, after having considered all of the evidence, with reputation on the line, stood up in public, against (idiotic and emotional) public opinion and took my side. And you're the one ranting and raving about ZOMG THE WOMENS!!!!

Ok, so paralegal? Law student? Though my bet is daddy's a shitlaw lawyer somewhere in a secondary market ("I know an attorney")? Just do me the favor and tell me which one it is.

Hehe, luckily I don't need you to believe me. You don't sign my bonus check. ;)

Right, as apparently is the judge who risked his reputation to publicly set aside this ridiculous verdict.

I went to a top 10 law school, I'm admitted in two bars (unlike you know who) and work at a top 5 ranked corporate firm.

Well first, no one is arguing against him being found guilty of misusing the official database, for which the conviction still stands, for which he served time. It's very rare that a cop is found guilty of anything, and so I applaud it.

Is that what the "lawyer you know" told you to say? I'm going to go with the opinion of the judge, who I'm pretty sure read the facts of the case, and pretty much came to my conclusion. But the next time I need the opinion of a paralegal and/or law student, I'll make sure to check with you.

Make sure next time someone cuts you off in traffic, or bumps into you on the subway, or takes your parking spot, and you imagine yourself driving your fist though his/her face, you go right to the nearest police station and turn yourself in for conspiracy and/or attempt to commit assault.

You understand the difference between the FBI showing up at your door and a criminal conviction beyond a reasonable doubt resulting in a 100 year prison sentence, right? And you understand the difference let's say between reading or writing a story about rape and actually raping someone? But hey, I guess the judge who…

From what I remember, the "stalking" was going to dinner with a friend of his wife that he previously discussed online. And also he "arranged payment" multiple times, and nothing happened. The conspiracy prosecution was punishing a person for having fantasies society finds offensive, nothing more. It's sad that…