I own a 17 Yukon XL and it is one of the most comfortable vehicles I have ever been in. I took a ride in my friends M6 Grand Coupe last weekend, while the acceleration was crazy, the ride and comfort was not even close to my Yukon. If you have not been in one recently, you’ll be shocked by the level of refinement.

What’s more luxury, a loaded Yukon Denali or a base BMW? I guarantee the Yukon will have far more features, options, and “luxury”.

That’s the thing about luxury these days. Every car can be had with leather heated seats, touch screen displays, backup cameras, and radar guided lane-keeping tech. Is a top-trim Fiesta a luxury car if it can do 90% of the things an S Class can do? From a certain point of view, you could certainly argue that. So, what…

Yes and no. It really depends on how you define luxury. Is a vehicle a luxury vehicle for what it has, or for what it is? A Yukon Denali is unquestionably more luxurious than a base 3-series. Is the Yukon a luxury vehicle because it’s luxurious, or is the Bimmer a luxury vehicle because it’s from a luxury brand?

To your average buyer who’s getting heated leather seats, a powerful engine, fancy cruise control, backup cameras and a bunch of other options—what’s the difference?

Intent should be a valid arguement. Agreements are predicated on it.

I’m not sure that interpretation works.

I am a lawyer. The purpose of a merger clause is to prevent introduction of prior negotiations that might vary the court’s interpretation of the final written contract. I’ve only ever seen courts ignore merger clauses in cases where there was an ambiguity in the contract’s language.

That only happens if the terms of the contract aren’t clear on their face. The terms here are clear. The question appears to be which contract document governs the transaction. It’s possible the answer could be both—one an agreement with Ford, and one an agreement with the dealer—in which case Cena loses.

WHY DID YOU TURN?!?!

Found near by.

The eponymous Century. Surprisingly only weighs 3342lbs

For some reason, 2018's are rated 1 MPG less than 2017's. Maybe they’re just trying to be careful, what with all the lying and what have you.

While i agree, think “Horses not zebras.” Its an aphorism for doctors in training that if they hear hoofsteps, think horses not zebras. Similarly, counterjockeys at O’Reilzone are trained to use the computer because 99 out of 100 times the person walking through the door probably doesnt know the difference between…

‘16 F150 with the 2.7EB and the combined average is sitting at 22mpg without trying to be easy. Modern vehicles are surprisingly easy to get advertised figures with (in my experience).

Again, how is that different from a modern hot hatches that get low-to-mid 10s MPGs when they putter around town?

People want big AWD wagons. I have a family of 6, plus all of our crap to haul around. We have a Honda Odyssey, still not big enough.

It doesn’t happen as much anymore, but as a female, in the past I would frequently get the second degree about whether I knew what I was doing when I went to get parts. And then there were times when I was brought the wrong part, insisted it was the wrong part, showed them why it was the wrong part, and was still…

I think you may need to unfold your map one more time. Also it may be interesting to note that Alaska is not actually the island off the coast of Texas, like it looks.