The big picture of it may seem similar, but the enrichments themselves are entirely different.

You list one man who says he has evidence that the iron seeding works as intended.

That's really not saying much.

Could it not also be argued that the academic usage used as defense itself is nothing more than a reference to Tolkein?

I'm assuming the voiceovers are the quotes of interviewed citizens/survivors which are littered throughout the novel.

It's worth noting that in the novel, most of the villains are actually corrupt businessmen like Jim Taggart, and worse.

Bravo. In this comment, you have provided more substance than the article itself.

It's more like not wanting those goods to be public in the first place. You have made no point.

The article you link is incredibly dishonest. Johnson builds a straw man in his article. Nothing more.

It's not an implication that it HAD to based on history; it is a thought that it MAY have been based on history in light of this new information.

NO, NOTHING CAN STOP THE OOOOZE

I had tacos before seeing this post or knowing of the holiday, 'cause I'm just awesome like that.

Because that's part of the graphics mods. More realistic lighting.

Shakri = pest control of the universe

"In quantum mechanics, particles do not have a definite state unless they're being observed."

So he starts by treating Moore's Law, an extrapolation based purely on the past performance of actors in an industry, as if it's a legitimate universal principle.

"However this leaves the problem of people working in those jobs low wage jobs meeting their living expenses unsolved."

You're still dodging the question.

I did not ask what the phrase meant. I asked how a free market requires it, which you still have not answered.