Maybe I’ll go consult a lawyer friend as opposed to a guy with a political agenda on the internet.

From a legal and economics standpoint, it makes sense to have to pay Microsoft fees to advertise products on their platform. I doubt many companies would be happy if another company advertised products with game mods.

I just went and read Florida law on this and it’s kinda complicated to read and understand. It may be my lack of a law degree. Most of it refers to only if someone is actively attempting to enter the car, which would be hard to prove in the instance of moving vehicles. There’s a line for being attacked in one’s…

If the motorcyclist shot the driver? Probably would have been okie dokie considering he got run over.

An angry leaning personality?

I would love to see the video 5 minutes before a lot of situations. It would give context this kind of crap.

Attempted murder

Meow?

Those two are unrelated in the fact that I can have an opinion about both?

That and the massive, bright blue contrasting stripe in the middle.

That flag gives me a headache for some reason.

In a way, yes, but that’s also an official investment and if the people producing the game don’t deliver, Activision and its investors will burn them hard for not delivering a profit.

In med school we learn to try to keep the lines of communication open with a patient, and be open even when they’re closed off.

I guess that’s good then. If they’re working on it I have fewer complaints, but that’s a ton of money to have raised on the basis of promises of a game years down the line from now.

A game that hasn’t shown meaningful development strides has raised enough money entirely on PR and promises to send 3257 people to my medical school for free.

At least on the internet.

Well, I guess we’ve hit the end of the road for what we’re going to accomplish here. Enjoy your day.

Alright, clearly you’re unwilling to have a meaningful discussion on the topic without attacking me as a person. You’ve definitely proved me to be the worse person here. Good job. Clap clap.

I assume companies will find a mechanism to work around having to admit added sugars. Especially if the added sugars definition is strictly sugar, they can just add diluted forms of other ingredients that are high in sugar and pass them off as ‘necessary’ ingredients to the recipe.

It shouldn’t matter how the families feel.