Maybe, but it might be nice to know what foods insist that they add a bunch of sugar when there isn’t a need to. It’s less of a health concern and more of an openness concern. If you eat a yogurt, you might assume that all the labeled sugars are entirely necessary in order for the yogurt to still be yogurt. That’s…

Soooooo instead of being a pokemon game with real world locations, it’s a click here to win game with micro-transactions and walking?

I’m saying that they most likely won’t, and shouldn’t find satisfaction in the death of others, when they’re finding sadness in the death of someone. I don’t think being a victim eliminates you from a point of ethical discussion.

In a medieval world, even a fantasy one, did women even wear panties yet?

There’s low proof that indicates that executions make the victim’s relatives feel better. It’s more likely that they believe it is a just punishment, because humans run on a revenge based system. But the actual act of execution doesn’t fix the problem, nor does it feel as if anything has been done. It might actually…

Maybe, maybe not. The torture should be mental in that they don’t get to re-involve in society and are forced to live their lives inside a tiny community that they’ll never escape.

Too bad there’s no other effective means of isolating dangerous people away from society.

Well that’s good then.

At least the common problems with death penalties, like concern over potential innocence, is pretty much eliminated.

Dead people don’t feel like they’re being punished. Death penalties don’t serve as a punishment. They serve as a method to make society feel better. Thus, the death penalty is a socially acceptable killing in order to make others happy.

The US basically still uses the death penalty with regularity alongside countries that the people of the party which mainly supports the death penalty commonly call backwards and barbaric. Which is most of the middle east. I find that ironic.

The fact that there’s suddenly a difference is what is manipulative. People follow a system of logic and rules throughout their lives, and when you challenge that, it causes problems.

Why not just make it so the red x closes what you don’t want, like it does with 99% of my programs.

In fairness, people often won’t do something good for them even if it’s been proven to be almost or actually objectively better in every way.

Now imagine a hospital network having their computers decide it’s time for windows 10 and opps, suddenly everyone can’t access patient records. During active hours. Which is 24/7.

That sounds like horrible foresight on their part that there will be no need for major restructuring.

Yea, but that game is also 10 years old. Some people would enjoy some new stuff.

Rome II has 85$ worth of DLC.

I kinda liked FF9 a lot, but there’s no windows 9 so that’s not gonna work.

My desktops graphics drivers refused to work with Windows 10 and thus my computer ran at a nice low resolution until I reverted back to windows 7.