@1dollar93: NO WE ARE NOT AWARE. There is no proof, they're all just filthy lies to throw us off her trail.

@Forgetful: Where abouts in BC?

@FurtiveParsnip: I still don't know why you're on the COTD blacklist. I think I need to have a chat with the Management on your (and Brazil-Reporter's) behalf.

@rlj676-Carbon Footprint Size - Clownshoe: You nailed it. I don't need a truck, but have considered one, lightly-used a couple years old, if fully equipped to luxury-car standards. Like the Lincoln MK150, or whatever it is. It caters to people like me, who want a luxury car, but might need a truck a few times a year.…

Actually, there are so few people in BC and the Yukon because we're very particular about who we grant admission to. Can't just let anybody live here.

@Mad_Science: Ford Tempo Fanatic, please read Mr. Science's post in great detail, and take every word of it to heart. I'd memorize it, or print it out and frame it, hang it on your wall.

The verdict? "Feels just like a car."

@Kelster: If I had any desire at all to go to PickupTrucks.com, wouldn't I already know about this article?

So far, it looks like... a bit of grille, headlight, foglight, bumper fender and wheel.

@Slantsick, with Infinite Improbability Drive: I wrote an article entitled "W(h)ither Buick?" a few weeks back, and it was basically saying that, while I agree with you, and there's no current case for keeping Buick, it would really pain me to see them fade away, because of their long history of making some really…

@Mad_Science: A Wrangler with an LS* engine would be a thing of beauty. Mind you, it'd be fairly decent with a Hemi, too...

@boosted-lego-wagon: We don't actually require the TPS reports anymore, just the cover sheet that you need to attach to the front of the TPS reports.

@boosted-lego-wagon: Boosted, would it be okay with you if I just designate you to be my surrogate commenter while work is going to shit? I join a thread with something in mind to say, then see that Boosted has already posted it, almost word for word. Therefore, with your consent, all further Deartháir comments can…

@boosted-lego-wagon: Amen, brotha. Those. Are. Nice.

@War2d2: Secure In His Own Manhood: I can't say for certain, as I don't have a matte-finish car, but I BELIEVE it's just like any other car. The finish (at least on the one or two I've seen) is not actually rough to the touch or anything, it's just not reflective. I could be totally wrong though... I didn't pay that…

@leavethegun-takethecannoli: It's faster if you use an industrial chipper-shredder.

@Alfisted: The only reason I'd agree with you is due to Chrysler's amazing depreciation rates. A car that you can pick up this year for $65k, you can buy next year for $19k. That does make them much more affordable, but it doesn't exactly make them more appealing.

@engineerd: Hence the reason for the Burberry Banhammer.

@FurtiveParsnip: I forget. Probably at some point. My long-term memory ain't so great anymore.