dealkiller-ii
Deal Killer - Powered by Audi
dealkiller-ii

I’d go NP. If you’ve always wanted a late model Chevy Impala SS, but hated the torque steer, this is the car for you. Lose some of the bright work, put some steelies on it, and have one of the best sleepers in the neighborhood. It’s probably the only way you could do 90+ on Ohio interstates and not get pulled over.

I’m just saying I think their priorities are misplaced. Fiat/Chrysler is, again, placing most of their eggs in the large truck/SUV end of the market. This area is profitable now, because gas is cheap. This will not last. Dodge/Chrysler will have no small or mid-size fuel efficient car or CUV on the market, as they are

Yep. And do you know why? Because that’s what people are buying, and Chrysler needs to be building cars that buyers actually want, not another low volume porker that makes them $0.00 in profit. Only a healthy car company can build well sorted out sports cars most Jalops say they want.

That car has the weirdest automatic transmission I’ve ever seen. And VW makes some awesome steel wheels and covers too. They look five spoke alloys, but I guess the ad boys down at the dealership know more about the car then I do. I hope it works out for you.

No, not insects, it’s....

Yep, this is exactly what Fiat/Chrysler needs to be spending money on. Not a competitive SUV/CUV for Dodge, any type of mid size sedan for either Dodge or Chrysler, hybrid tech for their current fleet of cars or trucks, or, heaven forbid, a replacement for a the Charger/Challenger/300, which is over a decade old.

This is a NP all the way, if it really is a 60K mile car. A few things ping my bullshit sensor. First, for $1,800, why the hell is this still for sale after 7 days on market? Second, for only 60K miles, it has a fair amount of interior wear & tear. Third, it’s being posted “for someone else”, which is somewhat

I agree with Tom, but if you’re going Swedish, go for the last, best looking Saab built.

Nope. Since they are, presumably, riding in the back seats, I’m driving. If I drive, I get to configure the seats, therefore I know how it will go.

Correction:

My elderly parents just bought a 2016 EX model, and it is almost everything you said the 2017 model is. Their car is extremely comfortable in ride, and the engine provides adequate amounts of get up and go for what it is. The car is very easy for them to enter and exit, which is important in your 80's, and is the

If you google NCC-2904, it takes you to a wikimedia page referencing the Olds Silhouette. It’s a bit obtuse, but a sly reference, I suppose.

Snap instantly. Trust me. Tried it. Failed. But, for my part, only in a parking lot.

At high speeds, ie 60+ mph, undoubtedly. However, if you autocrossed it, that thing would be very quick & nimble with several 100 pounds of weight loss.

I hate sun-roofs, as they significantly cut into headroom, which is important for us tall people. Short people can just order them if they want to, but don’t inflict them on those of us who don’t want/need them. Thanks.

A star for you, my fellow NPR listener. I don’t know what I’ll do when Diane Rehm retires. I hope her replacement is as good. I’ll miss her Friday news wrap ups, it’s where I really get most of my info.

I am imagining the “health reasons” are his smashing his face in the steering wheel after his bright idea to cut the shoulder belts out of the car. Along with the compromised structural rigidity, that thing should be safe as houses in a crash. /s  

No, no, no. It’s more like this...