I have to agree that this post is a little irksome in its supportive attitude and that comparison, as both you and the commenter right above you point out, is just silly.

Oh, I see. I guess that clears everything up then.

I think your second point is one people miss or misuse far too often. Exposed muscles are more often about making the male character a bad-ass than a... sex...ass(?). Breasts: less so. Thumbs up.

Fucking hotdog glory hole? Sersiously?

Honestly I am less weirded out by that last one versus other furry stuff just because it actually sort of looks like an animal rather than some nightmare Disney mutant fuck-monster. Of course, I'll be far less happy when the picture pulls out to reveal that the cat has it's dick in a horse.

Dear Lady Demoman. You are the motherfuckin greatest.

Good point but this team needs more spies if it ever wants a chance. Like, way more.

This is one of those things where I am going to have to reserve judgement. I'm normally with Dodai on pretty much everything, but I think McElhenney is a pretty smart writer and I trust that more will be happening than just "oh look, he's fat. Hahahaha."

I didn't say I am a master of the game; I said I understand the gameplay mechanics. One can know the rules of football without knowing every play that has been run in history. I know enough to compare Starcraft's gameplay to the gameplay of other games. That's all I've ever claimed.

I know enough about the gameplay. I've even watched a match or two online before. As a gamer (and an RTS fan at that), it's hard not to at least know the basics of Starcraft, even if you don't like it.

Bungie's Myth: the Fallen Lords, which came out in 1997 (versus Starcraft in 1998), is a far more strategy oriented game. I still consider it and its sequel among the best RTS games ever made and certainly my personal favorites. A year or so ago Myth II: Soulblighter (for which you can get and play the whole Myth I…

And yet that doesn't disprove my point. There are many games whose strategy varies on many levels before you even get deep into the game's mechanics. Starcraft is just not one of those games. It doesn't mean you and other people can't/shouldn't enjoy it. I find it to be shallow.

But wait for the twist... YOU ARE ON A SHIRT RIGHT NOW!

I don't quite agree with your argument. I think that accessibility, popularity, and honestly-good balance work are what made/makes Starcraft so viable for e-sports. Starcraft, as far as I have seen, is less about strategy and more about speed than other RTS. I don't deny that there are different…

touche

Yep. Those wippersnappers just can't appreciate a good ol chain-penis.

Agreed. There was some fun in the challenge of it for a while. But then, at one point I just looked at the controller, looked at the screen, and said, "I hate this game." Quit. Uninstalled. Felt immediately better.

I almost couldn't remember, probably as a defense mechanism for all the hate I pull from my friends for it, but here it is: Starcraft. That. game. sucks. Flat out. Bad story and boring as hell. As little in-built strategy as possible. Oh, and its ugly too. And here's the part that really infuriates people. I…

"But then again, how can you work for a video game booth and "not even hear of" Bioshock? Seriously?"

That looked horrendous. My old age has made me fall in love with my PvP and cheesecake games. No more horrendous brain torture for me anymore.