Let’s remember that Uber went to Arizona because it didn’t want to pay...$150.

Who’s saying that?

Well considering I never said anything about bankruptcy, I have no idea why you’d bring that up. Do you somehow think bankruptcy is the ONLY possible consequence here?

So basically you don’t understand how big 4% is in one day on the stock market, AND you don’t believe that his actions as a person and as a candidate have any reflection on what he will do as president. I’m not sure what you’re expecting, though. Magically on Jan 21 he will become an adult?

We have a lot to judge him by...I don’t understand why you think none of this matters when LM stock went down $1.2 billion due to his actions.

Some of every president’s appointees have no ties to Washington. This is no different in that respect. The main difference is how many of them are multimillionaires and billionaires with little to no government experience.

Do you know who controls the interest rates?

No, they didn’t. They died YEARS later getting the plans as part of the TRAAAAP that was the Second Death Star.

PS, Chris Matthews also fawned over George W Bush landing on an aircraft carrier as a passenger:

OK but Brian Williams didn’t write this story...and in fact The Concourse had a story that was critical of just this sort of thing. So, who on Earth are you talking to with this comment? Certainly not me. Perhaps you meant to address this comment to a different website? NBC, maybe?

Oh, so Brian Williams is the entire press corps now?

Dude. Don’t complain about that which you have not researched. “Gut feeling” doesn’t really work here.

It’s really only like this in a couple private lots off Abbott. The lot I typically tailgate in is pretty tame by comparison.

Doesn’t mean it has any bearing on the University of Minnesota’s rules, either. They have no such principle embedded in their rules. Therefore, saying that “innocent until proven guilty” should apply to their suspension is prima facie not true.

So it’s kinda wise not to just GIVE them excuses, no?

“No reason”?

They didn’t say there is “zero” evidence. They said it’s “inconclusive”

Based on what evidence is that “hard for [you] to buy”?

So because no charges were filed, nothing happened?

Based on the DA’s opinion. Not an ‘inconclusive set of facts’