The Jedi tell Osha they were killed that way. THAT is what will be contradicted.

What are you talking about? I don’t know how many other ways I can put this: I’m expecting them to retell it from a different perspective in a future episode.

My suspicion is that he was indeed scripted to respond there, but because he doesn’t, Daemon’s silence reads as “You’d better find him”, not “Hmm... give me a second and I’ll come up with an alternative for you”.

It’s literally not. If you’d actually watched and understood Rashomon, you’d know that it presents contradictory versions of the same event, because Rashomon uses unreliable narrators.

To be honest, I thought it was a bit of a mess.

No, it isn’t. That’s me demonstrating the difference between not being told everything and not being able to trust what we have been told.

No, because the show is available on iPlayer for those 18 hours too.

I’m sorry, but where was the interiority? The bias? The perception?

4.01m is the final “+7 (TV+4-screen)” for the first episode of the season, which includes delayed viewing and streaming over the first week.

When did I ask for the show to answer my questions now?

viewership figures have been dropping for everything across the board because people just don’t watch TV live as it airs anymore

Also kind of weird to see 5.6 million viewers referred to as bad.

There’s no way Disney cancels it after the money they put into it.

It’s quite possible people who would have watched on iPlayer in the past are watching on D+

Mostly because it’s released a day earlier than it appears on the BBC.

No, not right.

Except I do not think “a small fire started by child in a STONE TEMPLE somehow killed 27 powerful darkside force users”. There’s obviously more to it.

You can’t just have your unreliable narrator leave in the middle of a scene and have the scene continue without them. That’s a basic rule which this episode breaks at least twice.

By definition, it’s told from the narrator’s perspective. It logically cannot contain information that person was not aware of. If they weren’t present to see it first-hand, then they must have a way of learning about it second-hand. That’s still not always true here.

An unreliable narrator has to be present for the events that they’re narrating. That’s not always true here.