Inc. is not a scientific publication, it is a business publication. It has no reason to adhere to scientific rigor. Just....stop.

Unfortunately no, not informative, just annoying. Not that I disagree with you btw.

Wow another article that’s 90% racist sterotyping of white people, and 10% actual lifehacks.

I mean...he was half right...

The thing is in some circles disagreeing always leads to a huge fight, so “you don’t have to start a huge fight” and “making it absolutely clear you disagree” cannot be mutually exclusive.

Oh so we have to listen to, and subesequently support the argument of the podcaster to be able to respond? No. Summarize their points before you make yours.

It doesn’t help when other extremists assault and try to silence peaceful people they associate with those groups.

Oh thank you for your permission to like the things and people I enjoy, as long as I conform to your authoritarian decrees.

It would probably also help to mention that rabies is one of the most lethal diseases known to man. People might take it more seriously then.

Truth, I can kind of get the family thing, and agreed, that’s all that really matters.

I wouldn’t say emotional attachment is required for a sexual attraction, however from your further description the bisexual label is in fact inaccurate. My only question is, and I’m assuming since your family knows you’re “out”, why have sex with someone you’re not sexually attracted to? I’m a straight man, I could…

Why wouldn’t you think the bisexual label applies? Are you not sexually attracted to these women you have sex with?

Word policing getting into mundane colloquialisms now?

A smartphone is not an action camera...

No reason to be threatened by it, until you’re Hugh Mungus and being screeched at for making a self deprecating joke about your own weight because you didn’t want to give someone your name.