dbury
dbury
dbury

Your knowledge of biology is incredibly incorrect.

No, sorry, that's missing the point. Given the same level of training (which is inherently a choice) there will be different levels of ability based on the initial inherent characteristics. So, to use dunkin's example, if you take a woman and a man and have them both train equal amounts to develop arm strength, the

What exactly is the point of this article? Chances are, the guys that this is complaining about aren't reading Jezebel, and if they are they're pretty likely to just disregard what's said here (or mock it, as some of the comments have done). And to all the commenters giving their own advice, or cheering on what's said

Your ETA doesn't make your statement less biased/ignorant.

All very interesting...was on proactive briefly in HS about 10 years ago, but it was my parents' account so I don't know anything about the cancellation process.

+1, couldn't have said it better

because that totally was the point rolvino was trying to make...

Lol really? "Mansplainy"? It's called debating. Ya know, where one person offers a point and the opposing partying offers a counterpoint. But sure, retreat behind your derogatory remarks and amorphous statements that ultimately distill down to nothing more than "I think this is true and therefore it must be true"

I wish people like you would stop using anecdotal evidence as if it's scientific fact. Yes, I'm sure we all know thin people who are really pretty unhealthy / unfit and heavier individuals who are in better shape than you or me (power lifters come to mind), but ON AVERAGE an individual who lives a healthy lifestyle is

Also, just fyi, muscle is not heavy (no heavier than anything else of equal weight). Muscle is more dense than fat, yes, but the statement of "muscle is heavy" is just silly.

Did you read any of my responses to Juventina? My guess is no

Sorry, when I said obesity I meant being in the overweight range (the studies were pretty clear that their findings didn't apply to anyone in the "obese" category). The same issues apply, though, despite my poor word choice.

I know what you're referring to, and if you read the actual papers (instead of the generally poorly summarized versions you get from pop sources) that isn't the conclusion they come to. Thinness is a (somewhat poor) proxy for healthy living, but obviously isn't necessarily equivalent to healthy living. Similarly,

To complain about someone saying that people should aspire to a healthy body weight is kind of ridiculous, don't you think? The actresses she's quoted as admiring were just that - in a range that is healthy for them (whether they maintained that weight by unhealthy methods is another issue entirely).

where is Biddle's post about using your phone while having sex, because that definitely needs to be here

go listen to anything from "Come on feel the Illinois" and then tell me Sufjan is hipster crap (he's not). This is not one of his better songs, though, I'll give you that.

+1 exactly what I was thinking when I read the linked op-ed from Dash.

don't worry, it's used improperly

you should probably find a microsoft store and play with one, the screen is damn impressive. stop paying so much attention to resolution

The cases referenced in the brief would imply otherwise, as would this excerpt: