You can tell by sound alone that there's something fishy about an SRT Jeep.

One of my favorites is Jafromobile. Informative and detailed videos on old turbo Mitsubishis. He tries to upload a video roughly once a month, but those videos are usually 20-30 minutes long and well worth the wait in my opinion. Some of his projects include an Eclipse GSX, a turbocharged 1992 Hyundai Elantra built…

I was specifically talking about the Firehawk, the very expensive one they tried to sell by telling you it had the same front brakes as an F40. Their success can be debated, handling was the intent though. And no I haven't driven one of the 27-ish '92 Firehawks. I've driven a GTA though and while not amazing, it's…

An incredibly expensive GM F-body designed for handling? Not that far fetched.

and I'm calling bullshit on that cable being able to hold the weight of that laptop while she's pulling down on it and not slip out.

I'd like to see the badge for the Cadillac Antoine de la Mothe, Sieur De.

I disagree. It's a usable small SUV that spends 98% of it's life on pavement, no need for the dead weight of 4wd. That being said, mine is currently for sale.

I saw side pipes, a tigershark mouth, and the phrase "machine gun can be removed when the car is used in road"

I knew a guy that bought one of these. He claims it was the cheapest new car that fit his needs and also had better benefits than some of his other options. Though I believe he honestly looked at a new Fiesta before he bought this, which admittedly confuses me a bit.

However if you were like me and got into GT5 late, you probably had some DLC, so you had cars that allowed you to be lazy and just walk past all the competition on the straights in the early races.

I almost went to this museum once, Now I regret not doing so.

1996 Jeep Cherokee Sport. 2 door, 2wd, 4.0 High Output straight 6. AW4 trans. Got it for $500, took care of some neglected maintenance, suddenly a cheap, dependable daily driver.

Could it have an engine?

$6500, or $3.30 a pound.

He changed the tune in the ECM to run it lean enough that it wasn't actually safe to go WOT. Worked for cruising in 6th gear though.

420 lb-ft of torque. I'm impressed, considering that's actually more 120 more than the 5.4 V8. (using the 2008 for comparison, not sure if they changed it since then, they may have)

Last I saw the engine has already been mounted in the car. Transverse mounted origins doesn't mean it won't work, can make for a creative plumbing experience though.

Probably not the best for this particular question. I remember my mothers 3.9 V6 extended cab Dakota being a bit tail happy in the rain. Having also driven a full size truck with a 5.9, an R/T seems like nothing but a burnout machine that's going to find it's way into a tree or phone pole.

I feel like pointing out that a 2 door 2wd XJ with the 4.0, thanks to low weight and a reasonable amount of torque, will feel fast while not actually being fast. I also have a theory that you could convince somebody that a 4.0 sounds like an old jag if you tried hard enough and the person in question had never heard…