two things, 1. i think it’s worth acknowledging that i’d be more annoyed about performance issues had i paid $60 and not received a review copy 2. things should be expensive to compensate workers well and fairly, but most of a video games’ $60 is not going to the people that made it (as far as i know).

i’d love to see…

it’s kinda weird that you throw around “Nintendo” like they are the developers of the software or the people who would communicate via patch notes. 

Your ad-blocker is blocking the Amazon links.  The non-Amazon links are unaffected.  If you want to see them, disable your ad-blocker and enjoy the horrendousness of this site without an ad-blocker.

That’s not snark, friend, that’s straight up contempt for people who say shit like that. This is a guy who decries the hold super movies have on the industry yet says he loves a military fantasy superhero movie.

Bullsh*t. There’s plenty of times I’ve found Chappelle funny. I didn’t find this funny. It’s not one or the other. 

Lorne seems to be the reason we get people like Trump, Musk, and Chappelle hosting. Wish he'd leave already.

My gf and I talk about this last point constantly. SNL is at it’s best when it’s at it’s weirdest. Just off the wall absurd shit, that’s where the show shines. I agree that it’s time for Lorne to move on and hand the keys to someone, I dunno, half his age.

Yeah, skipping this one. 

I used to love chapelle but as I have gotten older and really looked at it a lot of his content is actually pretty weak and primarily punching down. even his old stuff was really just punching down on poor people.

Are you under the impression that mystery cards are the same for everyone? Killmonger isn’t 462 unlock. He’s in pool 2 so he can be from 222 to 475. Zoo decks aren’t as bad as you make it out to be. You can easily hold back your 1 drops until turn 6 and if you do you’ll likely be behind on board meaning they’ll flip…

If you don’t care, then why did you click on the article?

Props to Reynolds for being a dick to TJ Miller.

I don’t recommend arguing with this user.  Get out while you can.

Don’t lie.

Let me introduce you to the very commonly used means of preventing the very issue you presented: the consent waiver.

So your dumb ass never heard of a waiver, huh?  How’s that possible?

Wrong. The answer is to have the woman sign a consent waiver and be able to get the medication. Then the doctor is legally protected and the woman isn’t treated like a child who doesn’t know what she wants. Easy peasy.

If NY is a one-party consent state for recording purposes, I fail to see an actual cause of action by the hospital. It’s also not illegal to announce you do not like your doctor and why. Case in point: Google reviews.

You’re just proving my point, guy. 

If the doctor’s personal philosophy potentially violated the Hippocratic oath, then she’s well within her rights. Or will you also be clutching pearls about the other patients that posted negative reviews of the same doc as well and telling what they should be doing instead?