The act of commenting innately demonstrates interest. People who truly have zero interest just don’t even click on the post in the first place.

But if it holds “no interest”... why did you click on it? Why did you comment? The drama obviously interests you even if you have zero investment in the outcome.

You’re truly an indictment of the American education system. What you’re saying over and over is that if the people who voted for Jill Stein just left that box entirely blank, you’d give them a free pass. That. Doesn’t. Make. Sense. It’s a completely emotionally driven argument. You can see the affirmative votes for…

No, because you still obviously didn’t think about it at all. But I tried. You decided someone is your enemy and you’re going to stick to it, no matter how pitiful or illogical that position is. Tribalism will kill us all.

Truly a herb of the first order.

Deleted your comment for not in any way addressing the point I raised. Care to try again with an actual thought?

Yes, and more than 1.8 MILLION active registered voters didn’t vote for president at all in Michigan in 2016. That’s over 35 times the number of people who voted for Jill Stein, so why are you (and everyone else) blaming her voters and not the massively more numerous non-voters?

Yaaawn.

I don’t get the argument that specifically people who vote for third parties are to blame, when there are fucktons more people who didn’t vote AT ALL. Until we have compulsory voting in this country (read: never), there’s truly zero logic to blaming third party voters.

Offering a product for sale is not “exploiting” people. If she’s not providing what she’s selling, then that’s a problem. But as far as I can tell, she’s discovered a market and is providing products to meet that demand. That’s exactly as ethical as all other businesses in a capitalist system.

Minecraft.

They’re only a “valid set” if they leave 3 more valid sets behind, though. So human referee or no, you’re messing up another set by not getting the exact intended answer to the puzzle.

If you can’t tell that “Megan Thee Stallion” and “Tyler the Creator” belong in the same category, you’re never going to get gud at Connections. Finicky pedantry will not help you.

You’re a monster.

“Is that a common occurrence? One category that has 5 answers”

Sometimes you do totally unnecessary, valuless things just because they’re hard? With a large publicly traded corporation? ... but why?

Yes, that’s called being a psychopath. Your priorities are dramatically out of sync with society and all human moral philosophies. You should be locked up for the safety of others, and I’m sure you will be.

You don’t have to speculate about how this plan won’t stop a theoretical organized crime group shipping parts to China - the data from Hawaii shows that’s obviously not a large percentage of thefts.

Why are we just taking this guy’s word for it that there are only 30 great sitcom writers? I’d suggest (also without evidence) that there have ALWAYS been way more great TV writers than that - they just had no opportunity when there were only three networks.

Or pick a service with several shows you’d like to watch and subscribe for a month and then cancel. You’re missing out on some truly excellent shows if you never check out any streaming exclusive, and for the price of a movie ticket it’s a no-brainer in terms of value.