What does your ignorance have to do with the facts of this case? This has happened to people all over the US.

I know there are zero standards around here, but 114 million people did not watch his first episode. Even if you believe the numbers Twitter puts on tweets, it only means 114 million people were served his video in their feeds. It’s unlikely more than a few percent of those “views” translated into actually watching…

I had the same thought: you can’t copyright game mechanics. But it sounds like this case might be more about breach of contract. Hard to tell from this post alone. I can legally copy your game mechanic after it releases, but I can’t work on a project for one company and then take all those game mechanics to another…

Wait what? The Wachowskis are both trans, and have been pretty clear that the Matrix is explicitly a trans allegory:

People who lack representation in popular media care a great deal. Just like black kids were very excited for a black Little Mermaid, trans kids are rightfully excited to find trans representation in a movie. There’s a big difference between saying “it’s okay to be who you are” and showing it.

I dismissed your replies for, once again, not having a single original thought. Stop parroting racist talking points and pretending you’re “just asking questions.” That’s what racists *always say*.

You’re so close to getting it - good luck explaining why white people need “inclusion” when they’re already depicted at a much higher rate than they naturally occur in the general population.

Why do racists like you break out this argument as if it’s brand new, and you just thought of it? This has been the first…

Black people have existed in Europe for its entire existence. Pretending otherwise is ahistorical and nakedly racist.

Why wouldn’t he do it? If, for example, the cost of complying exceeds the cost of just blocking news links, he actually has a fiduciary responsibility to block news links.

Something can be both tactically brilliant AND cringe at the same time. 

This is the first I’ve heard that non-writers are not even supposed to *promote* their work during the WGA strike. Aren’t actors and directors still doing interviews and photoshoots and such?

Yeah, but when someone responds to your post, they’re not taking issue with every point in it. You have to, you know, read the response to understand the critique. Clearly you’re not interested though, so just dismiss this and move on. Lordy, what a baby.

How did surprise come into this? I’m not surprised, and neither was the original poster - “shocked” is almost always a sarcasm signifier online.

Yes, you do. All teachers need to understand the tools their students are using in class, especially if the teacher is ALSO going to use that tool. Five minutes on Google would’ve informed this professor that ChatGPT can’t identify its own output. His problem wasn’t that ChatGPT is too technical for any non-specialist…

I was contesting your comparison that this is the equivalent of “a computer science professor, expected to equally understand best cyclical farming practices.” You don’t need to understand the theory of LLMs to understand what they can and can’t do for you - your comparison is way off base.

The problem is not that a professor doesn’t understand the theory behind LLMs. It’s that he assumed that he DID know that ChatGPT could do something that it can’t do (i.e. accurately tell you if it wrote a sample of text).

Uhhh... no, actually, you’re being breathtakingly naive. Criticism of Soros has ALWAYS been about antisemitism - there is no rational critique of him. Inform yourself before spouting off.

That’s because you were paying more attention to cultivating your misogyny than to absorbing the actual story. Because you’re a bad person. Be better, shithead.

So what you’re saying is: you don’t understand how psychological abuse works, and because you don’t understand it you’re going to assume it’s not real and everyone just chose to be abused? Be a little more humble and learn about something before dismissing it - you sound like a total dolt.

None of the actors of color had their skin color as a subplot either, so what exactly are you comparing this to?