It’s always nice when racists just come out and tell us who they are, as you’ve done here. Try being a better person, angry little snowflake.

What on Earth are you talking about? Designing a system that will only work on white people is *by definition* racist. How much harm a racist act causes or doesn’t cause has no effect on the racist nature of the act, nor does the intent of the actor.

You really haven’t thought this through. The historical data doesn’t contain perfectly accurate counts of who committed every crime - it contains ONLY counts of crimes that were prosecuted and/or recorded. For example: if a racist white police officer only tickets black people for jaywalking, ignoring all the white…

You’ve dramatically misunderstood the situation if you think their tax district was helping them pay *lower* taxes. It gave them more control, but also required them to shoulder more of the tax burden. If the district was permanently disbanded, it would lead to huge tax increases on residents in the surrounding…

I don’t even have my adblocker enabled on gmail, and I’ve never seen anything tagged “ad”, or any ads at the top. Am I just special?

Uhhh... a literal child could script “AI” for this game. Floating the idea that they “did a bad job” when they’ve created one of the most popular mobile games in years (which also has bot opponents that play much better than Agatha) makes you look like a total moron.

Literally no one on the planet was buying tons of credits to open caches desperately looking for Agatha. This is quite honestly the silliest Snap argument I’ve ever heard. So congrats on that, because the Snap community has plenty of truly silly disputes.

“Wasting money”? Okay, I guess you don’t actually play Snap, because there’s no way to “waste money” to acquire the card. Agatha is Series 3, so you can’t control when you unlock her, unless you use your monthly Series 3 unlock to get her, which is ALSO totally free.

It’s not a positive playstyle for the game, so they’re extremely unlikely to ever improve it. It’s just interesting enough to get people excited to try weird things while not being so interesting that it gets played all the time. I think they’ve balanced it perfectly.

Since they don’t actually want you playing Wanda, I doubt they’ll ever remove the booster effect. It’s clearly intended as a disincentive to play zombie Agatha decks just for the boosters.

Who spoke up for you? No one said “all fat people are offended by fat shaming” - the comment said “fat shaming him hurts people reading who have done nothing wrong.” This is an objective fact - there are people who are hurt by fat shaming.

Yeah, it’s a truly abysmal title, which is unfortunate considering how bonkers it looks.

You’re talking about contract law, NOT employment law. Without an employment contract, you have very little recourse under at-will employment.

“There is such a thing as the spirit of the law.” Not in a courtroom, there isn’t! This is honestly the absolute stupidest assertion I’ve seen in the comments in a long time. “Laws don’t have to be explicit”? Where on God’s green earth did you pull that one from? Laws get struck down by the courts for being overly…

Do you feel the same about people cheating in offline sports? Like if you’re playing a friendly game of basketball, you have no problem with people fouling left and right or just travelling down half the court? And if that’s “different” to you, I’d genuinely like to know: why?

Your comparison is silly. Clothing doesn’t “spoil,” and the characteristics of clothing that are valued by wealthy customers are frequently not the same characteristics valued by poor customers. It couldn’t be less like the market for tomatoes.

Nobody “needs” trendy clothes that an influencer would sell. People need clothes that are durable, professional, and machine-washable. I’ve done plenty of thrifting in my life, and the stores in my area have never lacked for clothing in those categories in a huge range of sizes.

I’ve never donated clothes to a thrift store assuming they would all go to poor people. They end up with a whole range of people - it’s simply a better solution than throwing my clothes in the garbage (even though that happens to a huge percentage of donated clothes anyways).

Stop making shit up. Thrift stores are not “running out of clothes” for low-income people - they may just throw a slightly smaller percentage of donated clothes in the garbage now. Find me a place in the US where thrift stores don’t have enough clothes to sell and I’ll eat my words, but I really don’t think you will.…

If you think that resellers are draining thrift stores of clothes so poor people have nothing to wear, you are so poorly informed on this topic that you’d be better off staying silent. Thrift stores throw out a HUGE percentage of donated clothes - not because they’re unwearable, but because they simply don’t have…