The Supreme Court would overturn this law out of hand. It’s so obviously unconstitutional, it’s a waste of money to even bother printing it on paper.

Kind of weird not to mention that Chris Thile was up there playing mandolin with them, too.

Oops, deleted again. Are you playing “who can get the last reply”? I’m happy to keep wasting your time, ya dim bulb.

Trolls like you who mass-respond to entire threads don’t deserve or truly desire thoughtful debate, but nice try. We both know you’ve never changed your mind about anything.

Deleted your racist trolling. Try harder, dummy.

Deleted your reply for being fucking stupid. Try again, darling child.

I’m as white as they come, and I can confirm: white people are EXTREMELY fragile cowards for the most part. Toughen up, you big whiny baby.

You probably think all the undersea towers in Little Mermaid are penises, too. The fact that this looks like “a sperm” to you says a lot more about you than the painting.

It’s pretty well-established at this point that it’s a weave. You’d better bring a boatload of expertise if you’re going to try to disprove that narrative.

Poor baby, hiding behind an anonymous handle because you can’t own your own shitty opinions. You’re a coward, plain and simple.

Throwing other humans out of helicopters is “sound reasoning”? Eat shit and die.

Words have consequences. You can share the opinion “my boss is a scumbag” publicly if you want, but the consequence of that is getting fired by said boss. Why is this so hard for people like you to understand?

Good God, you’re a moron. It’s not illegal to fire someone for the things they say in public. If you want him to win a lawsuit against his employer, please list the exact law they broke by firing him. If you need help Googling, look up the definition of “at-will employment.” Being an asshole is not a protected class…

Why can’t it be as simple as he has hired a different lawyer (which he has done)?

I’m sure “afterabortion.org” is a TOTALLY unbiased source. That’s why they’re so well-represented every year when they pass out Pulitzers.

This is like demanding that every article about Photoshop also seriously address the way its use in magazines contributes to body dysmorphic disorder.

So you’re suggesting there are people out there tech-savvy enough to think they can identify a Samsung phone at a distance, but too stupid to recognize a distinctive brand new iPhone? Color me extremely dubious.

Poor baby, can’t handle being judged by others. Ya triggered?

It means “moneylender.”

Wow, using one random soundbite (without attribution) to support a bullshit “both sides are the same” argument? Your rhetorical skills would make a high school sophomore shudder.