It’s not, especially, and it’s why I supported HIllary.

I don’t think you know the difference between “stupid” and “disagrees with me”.

“You have to reallypiss them the fuck off and/or scare the living crap out of them in order to get them to spray at you.”

You clearly have never lived in the boonies. I come within ten feet of all kinds of nutty animals on a pretty regular basis; it’s called stepping outside my house.

And you’re clearly one of those people that would pass a dying human in the street to feed a cat some milk.

The real stinger for me is I agree with his basic premise. However, that doesn’t support his opening line, and even people who have played before don’t know the particular playcalls and protection schemes employed by that particular team and so it’s not actually any advantage at all.

I don’t care about any of that; he said the thing the writer explicitly said he didn’t say.

Do I really have to pedantically explain the difference between intelligence as commonly understood and intelligence as a function of education?

Dude....

Offensive Linemen are the smartest players in the NFL on average, and NFL players are the smartest athletes on average (because they have to finish—or at least get halfway through—College).

But then why do they never call out the meatheads announcing the game who get this wrong nearly every time they open their damn mouths (whether they’ve played the game or not).

“Lang isn’t launching the tired old “these nerds never played the damn game!” complaint here, he’s making a valid critique about PFF’s method of qualitative analysis.”

YES! As a giant Sunshine fan, anytime Mario is teased around water I get excited.

*Psst* war has always been fought via spreadsheet.

Best OF double play ever:

Didn’t Facebook already admit that their numbers that are making everyone pivot to video were cooked and they lied?

Well, what if one party loves the daughter but the other one is determined to make life awful? Just stopping as the loving parent is categorically NOT the correct option.

That old saying, it takes two to tango? Yeah, it’s full of shit.

See, you’re making a fundamental error here: if it’s actually your argument you can’t call it a strawman.

Ok, you have no self consistency.