No probs here, bub - you pantsed yourself some time ago.

*smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding*

Unfortunately, what you DON’T have is an acceptance of facts. And really, the acceptance of a fact is the most important thing ...

True story: 'Watch an adult eat peeps/candy corn/a candy cane/Valentine's hearts/Cadbury egg/circus peanut/toast/bread of any kind/ham/spam/yams/milk/water for the first time' ... you know it's coming.

*smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding*

Actually, I’d imagine Ohio State fans are quite happy with the 47-45-4 record (you know, the "error of recency") against Michigan following Michigan’s 13-0-2 start (which was to be expected, as the two programs were not on an equal footing when the series started). Ohio State's 13-3 record this century (the really…

In all fairness, the discussion focused on the typical response - “Michigan still leads the series” - of Michigan Fan and/or moron, when faced with Ohio State’s 13-3 record against Michigan this century. So - not being a Michigan fan doesn’t eliminate you from that discussion.

Well - look at the “logic” you’ve displayed so far. I mean, I kinda get the sense that you ARE a soft cheese, of sorts ...

Let's see ... so far this morning you've tried repeating what I posted two days ago and calling it your own. And you've tried "wall of words going nowhere" ... what's next?

They’re both wrong. “Coach K” didn’t tell Brooks he was a “great/terrific player”. He told Brooks he was a “gweat/tewwific pwayer”.

Edit: ... and I FUCKING WROTE IT Wednesday at 11:00 PM, but now you want to claim it as your own thought

... and you would certainly have something there, had you EVER actually said that. However, all one needs to do is scroll up top to my first comment in this discussion, to see me initially correct your stupid.

I think you’ve just provided enough fresh stupid for the both of us ...

Nope - you’re wrong yet again.

In 1897 Ohio State played Ohio Medical, Case, Michigan, Otterbein, Columbus Barracks, Oberlin, West Virginia, Cincinnatti, Ohio Wesleyan. In the same year, Michigan played Michigan State, Ohio Wesleyan, Ohio State, Oberlin, Purdue, Minnesota, Wittenberg, and Chicago. So they played two common opponents that year but…

You ARE that dense!

Are you this dense in real life?

No - Michigan didn't "start the series as the better team". Michigan was the better, more established program - a national power, competing in a premier conference.

This is just so ... soccer.

Again - suggesting that 1912 is an “arbitrary” date just doesn’t make it so.