Nope - straight facts:

Nope - just providing you with the facts. Again.

Yes, I’ll always have the facts.

*smiling and nodding, smiling and nodding*

I see ... you’ve opted to go full-on chest-thumping halfwit mode, eh?

... OR, you can be a halfwit and thump your chest and shout about how wins from the late 1800s are as indicative as wins from THIS CENTURY, in terms of current relative program competiveness. You’d have to be a moron or a Michigan fan to see 1912 - Ohio State’s entrance into the Big Ten and competitive football - as…

Hey - it’s your logic. I’m just trying to show some appreciation for the day you’ve spent flogging it ...

You've just spent an entire day looking exceptionally ridiculous, while arguing that results from decades - much less centuries - ago mean no less than recent results. What difference would it make that they haven't played in decades? By your logic, Cornell - with its 12-6 record over Michigan - should be the favored…

Riiiiiight ... you’re harping about the “error of recency” thing again - Ohio State’s 47-45-4 Big Ten record against Michigan, over the past 104 years (the “recent” past).

Oh ... you mean you’ve given the Michigan Fan view on Elliott’s supposed infraction. Because he played the next week, and 42-13 ... Got it!

Cornell holds a 12-6 record over Michigan. Are you going to suggest that Cornell's program is historically better than Michigan's?

You've yet to explain exactly what Elliott should have been punished for - did he rape another student, or threaten to rape her for talking about having been raped?

Ohio State has a few championships under Smith's reign, as well. Of course, I'd imagine Buckeye fans would trade it all for a juicy tweet about professional 'rasslin' or milk ... you know - something more in the "public eye".

Perhaps that’s the prevailing view at Michigan, where things have been fucked up for some time. That isn't the prevailing view at many schools, including at Ohio State, I'd imagine - schools in which the AD has led a successful program that resulted in national championships.

Nope.

Gotcha!

Let’s recap ... first fifteen games of the series, played from 1897 to 1911: Michigan leads series, 13-0-2. From 1912 - the year Ohio State joined the Big Ten - Ohio State leads the series 47-45-4; and from 2000 on, Ohio State leads the series 13-3.

AD’s are only relevant when they say something that makes waves. That makes him more relevant.

What does Smith “being in the public eye” have to do with Smith directing a program that has won a national championship and multiple conference titles since the “tattoo scandal”? Which makes Smith "more relevant" - "being in the public eye" by tweeting incessantly about Judge Judy, or leading a program to a national…

LOL!