darthzurg
DarthZurg
darthzurg

As evidenced by the person in question in article above there is NOTHING in the Torah that states any such thing (and as an orthodox jew I can clearly state that even though your ignorant lashon hara above shows that you pick and choose when you want to apply orthodox principles). You have to do some serious

And specifically it’s to avoid contact with your own menstruating wife or partner, not just any woman who is. In fact, it very clearly states that in EVERY CASE where a risk of such exists the MAN must remove himself, and if necessary SLEEP ON THE FLOOR. rather than embarass or make his wife uncomfrotable.

It’s this thing they do where they make all of the rules more extreme than required in the Talmud to eliminate the tiniest possibility of sin. Like, there’s two reasons for the ban on touching women— the section that says to avoid contact with a menstruating woman and the section that says to avoid adultery with the

It ain’t just the Jewish faith. Fundamentalism is ridiculous, period.

She is.

Hey at least you understand jokes.

LMAO as a bacon cheeseburger and shrimp/lobster consuming Jew, yeah I am pretty much the LAST person you’d ever want to consult on Talmudic discourse

And what, exactly is the “danger”? He should have been forced to say out loud that granny porn is his fetish.

He is not an idiot, it’s in a Torah and definitely you don’t know Torah. You ignorant secular Jew.

“There was a general principle that a person should not put himself in a dangerous situation.”

Dude: “It’s in the Torah”

Good! That guy is an idiot. I say this as a Jewish American, the leeway that orthodox sects and Hasidim are given in secular situations is beyond ridiculous.

Just the matter of factness of the statement along with the timing and the fact that no evidence had been presented despite the fact that there were witnesses and cameras rolling. In this particular situation, given the nature of the show and general voraciousness of reality show participants, it felt like and attempt

The producer happens to be her best friend, and many accounts allege that the producer was trying to protect corinne’s reputation and shot at a potential spin-off.

The problem here though is the strong suggestion of two totally blind-drunk people, equally incapable of consent.

It’s literally in the first sentence....

I know this is Jez and all, but it’s absolutely astonishing people are questing this result. There was video evidence and eyewitnesses saying “Corrine is lying”, most of the cast, male and female, cut ties with her on social media, there’s accounts of her pulling the same thing with 3 other guys, but everyone wants

There have been multiple, independent accounts saying “there was no wrongdoing”. There’s video evidence. Implying the contrary is just wrong at this point. Thank god for Demario there were eyewitnesses and video evidence, this was character assassination and false accusation of a crime. The callousness of this

Honestly, I think it means there are one or two asshole holdouts who are making up nonsense scenarios in which consent could be obtained from a woman who was drugged (“well, before he drugged her she likely would have had sex with him because she was in his room!”). IME on a jury there is always some asshole who

Yeah I kinda had the feeling it was going to suck when I heard Tom Cruise was starring in it. Say what you will about Brenden Fraser’s overall career (I’m not a movie person so I literally don’t know what people do say) but he and the rest of the main cast made the old movies funny and fun adventure movies, and I