Meh. He’s both dead and an alleged child molester. I can’t be bothered to give a damn.

just because something can exist doesn’t mean it necessarily needs to

Lotta crickets from the terfs who will "always stand up to defend women and girls". 

Yeah, it’s hard not to feel inadequate when someone my age is running an entire country, while I struggle to put my dirty laundry IN the hamper instead of the floor.

So many of them also claim to have been abused themselves. It’s absolutely odd. I think there are a lot of women that want to believe that men can be victims of women. While it’s true most victims of IPV are female and most of the abusers are men. 

I would argue that remaining on Twitter in spite of the onslaught of abuse is a form of standing up to power. And being online is essential for organising these days. The Womens March Twitter is linked to womensmarch.com, a website dedicated to real world action. So yes, the Stonewall Riots and the Edmund Pettus…

You are missing the point, in your effort to paint participating on Twitter (and by implication online in general) as something optional and without consequences if it is not participated in. It is not. Being online is essential today in order to be heard. Whether privately owned or not, Twitter is an important public…

How is “group knowingly resists a police raid on a bar and resulting mistreatment, acts shocked when it gets the inevitable beating from New York Police”, a “live demonstration of standing up to abuse and power”?

I just posted something similar. But I’m more horrified with the number of women that are a part of Depp’s rabid defenders. No matter how faithful you are to him, he’s not going to fuck you either ladies.

It’s so unbelievably depressing how many women are Depp supporters attacking other women.

for the hundredth time...what is it about Johnny Depp that incites this kind of absolutely feral psychotic response? I have had so many encounters with these whackos for merely stating that maybe he’s guilty because a UK court found it “substantially likely” he beat her, and HOLY SHIT you’d think I called him a…

The fuck is up with that title? The article is supportive at least but seriously... the fuck is with that borderline sarcastic tone and condescending tagline:

Holland’s been making movies non-stop for years since he was a teenager. Mental health or not, it’s not surprising that he might just want to take a break (and occasionally becoming Twitter’s Main Character through gossip stuff about him and his personal life probably doesn’t help).

I know you’ve snuck in an ordinary photo of Zuckerberg, but I can’t tell which one it is.

The idea that men and women in our society—in *any* society—have had similar enough journeys to evaluate their comments in identical contexts is fucking ridiculous, and it’s exhausting seeing it in comment after comment here on Jezebel.

Cringe dude. Stop projecting so much.

in my mind she was really the first politician to give meaning to the phrase “word salad” LOL. I’ll never forget her stammering her way through Katie Couric’s liberal gotcha question “what do you read?” back in the day.

Except her politics were never that well formed. She was the proto-Tea Party person (which means she was a proto-Trump) , all vibes, dog whistles and no real policy preferences other than things that will let her consolidate the voting bloc she’s going for. Palin will have no problem blending right in with the largest…

Thought of Palin, Greene and Boebert walking the hall of Congress together is depressing as all fuck.