Here he is with his step-brother.

A couple years ago, this charming young gentleman was found trotting down the side of a highway at the age of three months, with no tags or collar. He's the light of my life.

Is it a hassle to have to remember to star your own comments? Do you ever forget to, and then get frustrated that people recognize what a fool you've made out of yourself?

Yes, I can imagine how embarrassing it must be to have been humiliated after trying to be a know-it-all, by having it revealed that you're actually a "know-none-of-it"... :)

No, you're wrong. It's "shoo-in". As in, you're "shoo-ing" the entity towards the obvious result.

Pssst.... You don't have a good sense of humor. And you're a spaz and an asshole, apparently, too.

Dude, the valid point you started with, regarding the less-than-perfect kerning, has been WAY overshadowed by how much of a dickhead you're being. Honestly, if you want anyone to take you seriously, dial back the screaming raging chest-thumping, and act like a calm rational adult. Then Mr. Gonzalez will probably be…

I didn't "win" anything, really. I just successfully proved how disgustingly abhorrent you are. When horrible people like you are allowed to exist, and continue to spread their bigoted hatred and violence, nobody is a winner.

I'm not going to play the video, based upon the lack of character you've already displayed here, but it's always nice to know that your opponent has officially surrendered the argument, because nothing says "I give up; I have no defense for what you've said" like correcting an obvious spelling error which clearly…

The actions by the clearly-annoying individual you assaulted did not even remotely warrant your severe over-reaction, if you described the events accurately. While some sort of response was certainly provoked, what you did was most certainly not provoked. (Again, assuming you represented the facts accurately.) Oh,…

Obvious troll is obvious.... And a stalker, too, apparently.

"...I punched the shit out this guy..."

Only a complete moron wouldn't have been doing it this way by default to begin with. Why is this an article??

Riling others amuses you. That is, once again, the definition of a troll. Thanks for continuing to prove me right! xo

The commenter you were responding to (Alexander Stream) "loved the story and the characters" and fully admitted it was own deficiency that caused him to be unsatisfied by it ("...I just don't have the patience for it..."). You, on the other, made the batshit-insane claim that the story of LOTR would "barely fill a…

Sure, technically speaking, it's a matter of opinion. (In the same way that saying, "The Phantom Menace is a WAAAY better film than The Empire Strikes Back," is an opinion...) But you knew damn well that your particular opinion would be extremely unpopular, and that the only possible outcome of sharing your…

Wow, so you're also one of those creepy stalker-types that pores over people's past commenting history?? That is soooo CREEEEEEPYYYYYYYY.... Please, just stop. You clearly have no business posting on the Gawker network if you A) Don't think it's okay to use gifs in a heated exchange, and B) Can't handle it when people…

What hyperbole? Where? Name it. The closest thing to hyperbole in our exchange has been your claim that book spoilers and date rape are comparable.

I didn't "convince" myself. Any rational, objective person would look at our comments and say "Well, that Toxic guy is saying that LOTR is crap, and that Ewok person is defending LOTR, and calling it 'high literature'. Clearly the Ewok person is the sane one in this exchange, and that Bunnies character is just…

How so? Honestly, Mr. "My Plight of Having a Book Spoiled Is the Same As Date-Rape", please expand upon how I showed any bigotry or intolerance whatsoever. (Are one of those people that doesn't understand what the word "literally" means?) I not displayed any hypocrisy in the slightest. Did you even read what he wrote…