darnray
darnray
darnray

I like Aimee's dress as well...from the front. I think the back has some issues.

Yes, a voluntary recall would have basically been good PR.

I have a feeling the flash-induced nakedness on Laura Bailey and Ellie Goudling wasn't intentional. You'd think as part of the dressing part, the stylist would have the actress stand in front of bright spotlights—or even camera flashes—to see how the dress looks when photographed.

They should have done the voluntary recall and just added a larger warning to the package. That's what other companies do when injuries/deaths occur in the course of someone misusing their product.

It's not. Was just making the point that "This is 40" centers on the female character, thus why this movie would be considered a "boon" to funny women.

It's not a problem. Just was making the point that the woman is the central character, thus why "This is 40" is a "boon for funny women." (In counter to @haru_haru's).

Well, yeah. They can't change what originally happened. But they admitted the mistake, apologized for it and are doing the only thing they can do at this point: edit it out of the show. The article above implies that the offensive outfit might possibly a part of the telecast despite the outcry—definitely willful

They condone the meeting, but I highly doubt they condone the behaviors of the leader in question. What she was doing is the opposite of what WW preaches. And, in my experience, Weight Watchers doesn't really promote their branded foods very much. I did the program online and was never really exposed to their

The leader mentioned in the article is absolutely NOT following the spirit of what Weight Watchers is all about. @Outie5000 is totally right on—it creates awareness of what we're putting into our bodies. It is about learning how to make your lifestyle (eating and activity habits) healthier. And it's worked for me in

About 2 days after the show was taped, VS announced that they would not air the Native American outfit during the telecast.

I'm not sure what the crime would be? It's definitely editorial use of the brand. Plus, the creators were smart and did not use the Victoria's Secret name, they used the PINK name, which isn't as strong of a mark.

And it apparently focuses mostly on the Leslie Mann character...

Agreed—and in branded form: The Kardashians are Full of Krap (TM)

It looks like the Kardashians did their due diligence: they filed to TM the names "Khroma Beauty by Kourtney, Kim and Khloé" and "Kardashian Khroma." This doesn't mean the applications can't fall through down the road, but in their legal review, their team must have considered the names clear for registration.

I agree that getting the child into modeling is a questionable (at best) decision on the dad's part. However, I'm not sure why saying that she is like her mom on set is bad. In 1993 Smith didn't seem to be the trainwreck she ultimately, and sadly, became. Perhaps he is simply saying that Dannielynn reminded him of her

I think the word we're looking for to describe Ginnifer's style, and this look in particular, is costume-y. I always like the IDEA of her style, she's a risk taker and I appreciate that. But I think her actual execution—'60s style dress with '60s stage makeup, etc.—is always so literal that it takes it to that costume

Mmmmkay. Stories like this abound, but it's the gays who are going to bring ruin to the institution of marriage? Right.

Agreed. I see women wearing leggings that might be opaque at the ankles...but are pretty transparent in the butt. Ladies, I don't want to see your butt. Leggings. Are. Not. Pants.

The thing about the "pants" phrasing is that it's used because that's the fashion theme of the trend pictorial they had her pose for. The title of the actual article is "Taylor Swift Wears the Pants"....with pictures of Taylor Swift literally wearing pants (this is a apparently a big deal because she prefers to wear

Then I think it's important to note that in this interview, the piece of info that this website cherry picked as most important is that one quote (obvs geared toward maximum page clicks). The article itself is called "Taylor Swift Wears the Pants," and focuses on fashion (the editorial is her literally wearing pants),